IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v15y2024i1d10.1038_s41467-024-45281-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nominally identical microplastic models differ greatly in their particle-cell interactions

Author

Listed:
  • Simon Wieland

    (University of Bayreuth
    University of Bayreuth)

  • Anja F. R. M. Ramsperger

    (University of Bayreuth
    University of Bayreuth)

  • Wolfgang Gross

    (University of Bayreuth)

  • Moritz Lehmann

    (University of Bayreuth)

  • Thomas Witzmann

    (Institute of Physical Chemistry and Polymer Physics)

  • Anja Caspari

    (Institute of Physical Chemistry and Polymer Physics)

  • Martin Obst

    (University of Bayreuth)

  • Stephan Gekle

    (University of Bayreuth)

  • Günter K. Auernhammer

    (Institute of Physical Chemistry and Polymer Physics)

  • Andreas Fery

    (Institute of Physical Chemistry and Polymer Physics
    Technische Universität Dresden)

  • Christian Laforsch

    (University of Bayreuth)

  • Holger Kress

    (University of Bayreuth)

Abstract

Due to the abundance of microplastics in the environment, research about its possible adverse effects is increasing exponentially. Most studies investigating the effect of microplastics on cells still rely on commercially available polystyrene microspheres. However, the choice of these model microplastic particles can affect the outcome of the studies, as even nominally identical model microplastics may interact differently with cells due to different surface properties such as the surface charge. Here, we show that nominally identical polystyrene microspheres from eight different manufacturers significantly differ in their ζ-potential, which is the electrical potential of a particle in a medium at its slipping plane. The ζ-potential of the polystyrene particles is additionally altered after environmental exposure. We developed a microfluidic microscopy platform to demonstrate that the ζ-potential determines particle-cell adhesion strength. Furthermore, we find that due to this effect, the ζ-potential also strongly determines the internalization of the microplastic particles into cells. Therefore, the ζ-potential can act as a proxy of microplastic-cell interactions and may govern adverse effects reported in various organisms exposed to microplastics.

Suggested Citation

  • Simon Wieland & Anja F. R. M. Ramsperger & Wolfgang Gross & Moritz Lehmann & Thomas Witzmann & Anja Caspari & Martin Obst & Stephan Gekle & Günter K. Auernhammer & Andreas Fery & Christian Laforsch & , 2024. "Nominally identical microplastic models differ greatly in their particle-cell interactions," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:15:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-024-45281-4
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-45281-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-45281-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-024-45281-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andreas Brachner & Despina Fragouli & Iola F. Duarte & Patricia M. A. Farias & Sofia Dembski & Manosij Ghosh & Ivan Barisic & Daniela Zdzieblo & Jeroen Vanoirbeek & Philipp Schwabl & Winfried Neuhaus, 2020. "Assessment of Human Health Risks Posed by Nano-and Microplastics Is Currently Not Feasible," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-10, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang Liu & Weiyu Li & Chunmei Tao & Junjie Zhao & Hongmei Zhang & Lingzhan Miao & Yong Pang & Jun Hou, 2022. "Distinct Responses of Biofilm Carbon Metabolism to Nanoplastics with Different Surface Modifications," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-12, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:15:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-024-45281-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.