Author
Listed:
- William J. Bolton
(Imperial College London
Imperial College London
Imperial College London
Imperial College London)
- Richard Wilson
(Imperial College London
Imperial College London
University of Liverpool)
- Mark Gilchrist
(Imperial College London
Imperial College London
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust)
- Pantelis Georgiou
(Imperial College London
Imperial College London
Imperial College London)
- Alison Holmes
(Imperial College London
Imperial College London
University of Liverpool
Imperial College London)
- Timothy M. Rawson
(Imperial College London
Imperial College London)
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and healthcare associated infections pose a significant threat globally. One key prevention strategy is to follow antimicrobial stewardship practices, in particular, to maximise targeted oral therapy and reduce the use of indwelling vascular devices for intravenous (IV) administration. Appreciating when an individual patient can switch from IV to oral antibiotic treatment is often non-trivial and not standardised. To tackle this problem we created a machine learning model to predict when a patient could switch based on routinely collected clinical parameters. 10,362 unique intensive care unit stays were extracted and two informative feature sets identified. Our best model achieved a mean AUROC of 0.80 (SD 0.01) on the hold-out set while not being biased to individuals protected characteristics. Interpretability methodologies were employed to create clinically useful visual explanations. In summary, our model provides individualised, fair, and interpretable predictions for when a patient could switch from IV-to-oral antibiotic treatment. Prospectively evaluation of safety and efficacy is needed before such technology can be applied clinically.
Suggested Citation
William J. Bolton & Richard Wilson & Mark Gilchrist & Pantelis Georgiou & Alison Holmes & Timothy M. Rawson, 2024.
"Personalising intravenous to oral antibiotic switch decision making through fair interpretable machine learning,"
Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:natcom:v:15:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-024-44740-2
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-44740-2
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:15:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-024-44740-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.