IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v14y2023i1d10.1038_s41467-023-40468-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A machine-learning approach to human ex vivo lung perfusion predicts transplantation outcomes and promotes organ utilization

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew T. Sage

    (University Health Network
    University Health Network
    University of Toronto
    University of Toronto)

  • Laura L. Donahoe

    (University Health Network
    University of Toronto)

  • Alaa A. Shamandy

    (University of Toronto
    University Health Network)

  • S. Hossein Mousavi

    (University Health Network
    University Health Network)

  • Bonnie T. Chao

    (University Health Network
    University Health Network)

  • Xuanzi Zhou

    (University Health Network
    University Health Network)

  • Jerome Valero

    (University Health Network
    University Health Network)

  • Sharaniyaa Balachandran

    (University Health Network)

  • Aadil Ali

    (University Health Network
    University Health Network)

  • Tereza Martinu

    (University Health Network
    University Health Network
    University of Toronto)

  • George Tomlinson

    (University Health Network)

  • Lorenzo Sorbo

    (University Health Network
    University Health Network)

  • Jonathan C. Yeung

    (University Health Network
    University Health Network
    University of Toronto)

  • Mingyao Liu

    (University Health Network
    University Health Network
    University of Toronto
    University of Toronto)

  • Marcelo Cypel

    (University Health Network
    University Health Network
    University of Toronto
    University of Toronto)

  • Bo Wang

    (University of Toronto
    University Health Network
    University of Toronto
    Vector Institute)

  • Shaf Keshavjee

    (University Health Network
    University Health Network
    University of Toronto
    University of Toronto)

Abstract

Ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) is a data-intensive platform used for the assessment of isolated lungs outside the body for transplantation; however, the integration of artificial intelligence to rapidly interpret the large constellation of clinical data generated during ex vivo assessment remains an unmet need. We developed a machine-learning model, termed InsighTx, to predict post-transplant outcomes using n = 725 EVLP cases. InsighTx model AUROC (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) was 79 ± 3%, 75 ± 4%, and 85 ± 3% in training and independent test datasets, respectively. Excellent performance was observed in predicting unsuitable lungs for transplantation (AUROC: 90 ± 4%) and transplants with good outcomes (AUROC: 80 ± 4%). In a retrospective and blinded implementation study by EVLP specialists at our institution, InsighTx increased the likelihood of transplanting suitable donor lungs [odds ratio=13; 95% CI:4-45] and decreased the likelihood of transplanting unsuitable donor lungs [odds ratio=0.4; 95%CI:0.16–0.98]. Herein, we provide strong rationale for the adoption of machine-learning algorithms to optimize EVLP assessments and show that InsighTx could potentially lead to a safe increase in transplantation rates.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew T. Sage & Laura L. Donahoe & Alaa A. Shamandy & S. Hossein Mousavi & Bonnie T. Chao & Xuanzi Zhou & Jerome Valero & Sharaniyaa Balachandran & Aadil Ali & Tereza Martinu & George Tomlinson & Lor, 2023. "A machine-learning approach to human ex vivo lung perfusion predicts transplantation outcomes and promotes organ utilization," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-8, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:14:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-023-40468-7
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-40468-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-40468-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-023-40468-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:14:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-023-40468-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.