Author
Listed:
- Dandan Li
(Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China
Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine)
- Chao Chen
(BGI-Shenzhen
Shenzhen Peking University-The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Medical Center)
- Jingjing Li
(Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China
Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine)
- Jianhui Yue
(BGI-Shenzhen)
- Ya Ding
(Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China
Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine)
- Hailun Wang
(BGI-Shenzhen)
- Zhaoduan Liang
(BGI-Shenzhen)
- Le Zhang
(BGI-Shenzhen
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences)
- Si Qiu
(BGI-Shenzhen)
- Geng Liu
(BGI-Shenzhen)
- Yan Gao
(BGI-Shenzhen)
- Ying Huang
(BGI-Shenzhen)
- Dongli Li
(BGI-Shenzhen)
- Rong Zhang
(Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center)
- Wei Liu
(Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China
Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine)
- Xizhi Wen
(Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China
Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine)
- Bo Li
(BGI-Shenzhen)
- Xiaoshi Zhang
(Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China
Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine)
- Xi Zhang
(BGI-Shenzhen)
- Rui-Hua Xu
(State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China
Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine
Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center)
Abstract
Currently, the optimal lymphodepletion intensity for peripheral blood mononuclear cell-derived neoantigen-specific CD8 + T cell (Neo-T) therapy has yet to be determined. We report a single-arm, open-label and non-randomized phase 1 study (NCT02959905) of Neo-T therapy with lymphodepletion at various dose intensity in patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors that are refractory to standard therapies. The primary end point is safety and the secondary end points are disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS). Results show that the treatment is well tolerated with lymphopenia being the most common adverse event in the highest-intensity lymphodepletion groups. Neo-T infusion-related adverse events are only grade 1–2 in the no lymphodepletion group. The median PFS is 7.1 months (95% CI:3.7-9.8), the median OS is 16.8 months (95% CI: 11.9-31.7), and the DCR is 66.7% (6/9) among all groups. Three patients achieve partial response, two of them are in the no lymphodepletion group. In the group without lymphodepletion pretreatment, one patient refractory to prior anti-PD1 therapy shows partial response to Neo-T therapy. Neoantigen specific TCRs are examined in two patients and show delayed expansion after lymphodepletion treatment. In summary, Neo-T therapy without lymphodepletion could be a safe and promising regimen for advanced solid tumors.
Suggested Citation
Dandan Li & Chao Chen & Jingjing Li & Jianhui Yue & Ya Ding & Hailun Wang & Zhaoduan Liang & Le Zhang & Si Qiu & Geng Liu & Yan Gao & Ying Huang & Dongli Li & Rong Zhang & Wei Liu & Xizhi Wen & Bo Li , 2023.
"A pilot study of lymphodepletion intensity for peripheral blood mononuclear cell-derived neoantigen-specific CD8 + T cell therapy in patients with advanced solid tumors,"
Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:natcom:v:14:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-023-39225-7
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-39225-7
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:14:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-023-39225-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.