Author
Listed:
- J. Daniel Kelly
(San Francisco VA Medical Center
University of California, San Francisco (UCSF)
UCSF
UCSF)
- Samuel Leonard
(San Francisco VA Medical Center)
- W. John Boscardin
(UCSF)
- Katherine J. Hoggatt
(San Francisco VA Medical Center
University of California, San Francisco (UCSF))
- Emily N. Lum
(San Francisco VA Medical Center)
- Charles C. Austin
(Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center
Veterans Affairs Medical Center)
- Amy Byers
(San Francisco VA Medical Center)
- Phyllis C. Tien
(San Francisco VA Medical Center
University of California, San Francisco (UCSF))
- Peter C. Austin
(Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences)
- Dawn M. Bravata
(Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center
Indiana University School of Medicine
Regenstrief Institute)
- Salomeh Keyhani
(San Francisco VA Medical Center)
Abstract
Studies of comparative mRNA booster effectiveness among high-risk populations can inform mRNA booster-specific guidelines. The study emulated a target trial of COVID-19 vaccinated U.S. Veterans who received three doses of either mRNA-1273 or BNT162b2 vaccines. Participants were followed for up to 32 weeks between July 1, 2021 to May 30, 2022. Non-overlapping populations were average and high risk; high-risk sub-groups were age ≥65 years, high-risk co-morbid conditions, and immunocompromising conditions. Of 1,703,189 participants, 10.9 per 10,000 persons died or were hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia over 32 weeks (95% CI: 10.2, 11.8). Although relative risks of death or hospitalization with COVID-19 pneumonia were similar across at-risk groups, absolute risk varied when comparing three doses of BNT162b2 with mRNA-1273 (BNT162b2 minus mRNA-1273) between average-risk and high-risk populations, confirmed by the presence of additive interaction. The risk difference of death or hospitalization with COVID-19 pneumonia for high-risk populations was 2.2 (0.9, 3.6). Effects were not modified by predominant viral variant. In this work, the risk of death or hospitalization with COVID-19 pneumonia over 32 weeks was lower among high-risk populations who received three doses of mRNA-1273 vaccine instead of BNT162b2 vaccine; no difference was found among the average-risk population and age >65 sub-group.
Suggested Citation
J. Daniel Kelly & Samuel Leonard & W. John Boscardin & Katherine J. Hoggatt & Emily N. Lum & Charles C. Austin & Amy Byers & Phyllis C. Tien & Peter C. Austin & Dawn M. Bravata & Salomeh Keyhani, 2023.
"Comparative mRNA booster effectiveness against death or hospitalization with COVID-19 pneumonia across at-risk US Veteran populations,"
Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:natcom:v:14:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-023-38503-8
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-38503-8
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:14:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-023-38503-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.