IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v12y2021i1d10.1038_s41467-021-26778-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Three-year outcomes of the randomized phase III SEIPLUS trial of extensive intraoperative peritoneal lavage for locally advanced gastric cancer

Author

Listed:
  • Jing Guo

    (Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center
    Fudan University
    Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou)

  • Aman Xu

    (The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University)

  • Xiaowei Sun

    (Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou)

  • Xuhui Zhao

    (The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China (Anhui Provincial Cancer Hospital))

  • Yabin Xia

    (The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College)

  • Huamin Rao

    (Jiangxi Provincial Cancer Hospital)

  • Yaming Zhang

    (Anqing Municipal Hospital)

  • Rupeng Zhang

    (Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin)

  • Li Chen

    (The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine)

  • Tao Zhang

    (Yuebei People’s Hospital)

  • Gang Li

    (Jiangsu Cancer Hospital)

  • Hongtao Xu

    (Lishui Municipal Central Hospital)

  • Dazhi Xu

    (Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center
    Fudan University
    Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou)

Abstract

Whether extensive intraoperative peritoneal lavage (EIPL) after gastrectomy is beneficial to patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (AGC) is not clear. This phase 3, multicenter, parallel-group, prospective randomized study (NCT02745509) recruits patients between April 2016 and November 2017. Eligible patients who had been histologically proven AGC with T3/4NxM0 stage are randomly assigned (1:1) to either surgery alone or surgery plus EIPL. The results of the two groups are analyzed in the intent-to-treat population. A total of 662 patients with AGC (329 patients in the surgery alone group, and 333 in the surgery plus EIPL group) are included in the study. The primary endpoint is 3-year overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints include 3-year disease free survival (DFS), 3-year peritoneal recurrence-free survival (reported in this manuscript) and 30-day postoperative complication and mortality (previously reported). The trial meets pre-specified endpoints. Estimated 3-year OS rates are 68.5% in the surgery alone group and 70.6% in the surgery plus EIPL group (log-rank p = 0.77). 3-year DFS rates are 61.2% in the surgery alone group and 66.0% in the surgery plus EIPL group (log-rank p = 0.24). The pattern of disease recurrence is similar in the two groups. In conclusion, EIPL does not improve the 3-year survival rate in AGC patients.

Suggested Citation

  • Jing Guo & Aman Xu & Xiaowei Sun & Xuhui Zhao & Yabin Xia & Huamin Rao & Yaming Zhang & Rupeng Zhang & Li Chen & Tao Zhang & Gang Li & Hongtao Xu & Dazhi Xu, 2021. "Three-year outcomes of the randomized phase III SEIPLUS trial of extensive intraoperative peritoneal lavage for locally advanced gastric cancer," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-7, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-26778-8
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-26778-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-26778-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-021-26778-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-26778-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.