IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v12y2021i1d10.1038_s41467-021-26679-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Magnitude and nucleation time of the 2017 Pohang Earthquake point to its predictable artificial triggering

Author

Listed:
  • Serge A. Shapiro

    (Freie Universität Berlin)

  • Kwang-Hee Kim

    (Pusan National University)

  • Jin-Han Ree

    (Korea University)

Abstract

A damaging Mw5.5 earthquake occurred at Pohang, South Korea, in 2017, after stimulating an enhanced geothermal system by borehole fluid injections. The earthquake was likely triggered by these operations. Current approaches for predicting maximum induced earthquake magnitude ( $${M}_{\max }$$ M max ) consider the volume of the injected fluid as the main controlling factor. However, these approaches are unsuccessful in predicting earthquakes, such as the Pohang one. Here we analyse the case histories of induced earthquakes, and find that $${M}_{\max }$$ M max scales with the logarithm of the elapsed time from the beginning of the fluid injection to the earthquake occurrence. This is also the case for the Pohang Earthquake. Its significant probability was predictable. These results validate an alternative to predicting $${M}_{\max }$$ M max . It is to monitor the exceedance probability of an assumed $${M}_{\max }$$ M max in real time by monitoring the seismogenic index, a quantity that characterizes the intensity of the fluid-induced seismicity per unit injected volume.

Suggested Citation

  • Serge A. Shapiro & Kwang-Hee Kim & Jin-Han Ree, 2021. "Magnitude and nucleation time of the 2017 Pohang Earthquake point to its predictable artificial triggering," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-9, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-26679-w
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-26679-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-26679-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-021-26679-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. I. W. Yeo & M. R. M. Brown & S. Ge & K. K. Lee, 2020. "Causal mechanism of injection-induced earthquakes through the Mw 5.5 Pohang earthquake case study," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Ziyan Li & Derek Elsworth & Chaoyi Wang, 2021. "Constraining maximum event magnitude during injection-triggered seismicity," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-9, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nepomuk Boitz & Cornelius Langenbruch & Serge A. Shapiro, 2024. "Production-induced seismicity indicates a low risk of strong earthquakes in the Groningen gas field," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-10, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pengliang Yu & Ankur Mali & Thejasvi Velaga & Alex Bi & Jiayi Yu & Chris Marone & Parisa Shokouhi & Derek Elsworth, 2024. "Crustal permeability generated through microearthquakes is constrained by seismic moment," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-26679-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.