IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v12y2021i1d10.1038_s41467-021-26452-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantifying previous SARS-CoV-2 infection through mixture modelling of antibody levels

Author

Listed:
  • C. Bottomley

    (London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
    London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine)

  • M. Otiende

    (London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
    KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme)

  • S. Uyoga

    (KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme)

  • K. Gallagher

    (London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
    KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme)

  • E. W. Kagucia

    (KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme)

  • A. O. Etyang

    (KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme)

  • D. Mugo

    (KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme)

  • J. Gitonga

    (KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme)

  • H. Karanja

    (KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme)

  • J. Nyagwange

    (KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme)

  • I. M. O. Adetifa

    (London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
    KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme)

  • A. Agweyu

    (KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme
    Nuffield Department of Medicine, Oxford University)

  • D. J. Nokes

    (KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme
    School of Life Sciences, University of Warwick)

  • G. M. Warimwe

    (KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme
    Nuffield Department of Medicine, Oxford University)

  • J. A. G. Scott

    (London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
    KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme
    Nuffield Department of Medicine, Oxford University)

Abstract

As countries decide on vaccination strategies and how to ease movement restrictions, estimating the proportion of the population previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 is important for predicting the future burden of COVID-19. This proportion is usually estimated from serosurvey data in two steps: first the proportion above a threshold antibody level is calculated, then the crude estimate is adjusted using external estimates of sensitivity and specificity. A drawback of this approach is that the PCR-confirmed cases used to estimate the sensitivity of the threshold may not be representative of cases in the wider population—e.g., they may be more recently infected and more severely symptomatic. Mixture modelling offers an alternative approach that does not require external data from PCR-confirmed cases. Here we illustrate the bias in the standard threshold-based approach by comparing both approaches using data from several Kenyan serosurveys. We show that the mixture model analysis produces estimates of previous infection that are often substantially higher than the standard threshold analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • C. Bottomley & M. Otiende & S. Uyoga & K. Gallagher & E. W. Kagucia & A. O. Etyang & D. Mugo & J. Gitonga & H. Karanja & J. Nyagwange & I. M. O. Adetifa & A. Agweyu & D. J. Nokes & G. M. Warimwe & J. , 2021. "Quantifying previous SARS-CoV-2 infection through mixture modelling of antibody levels," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-7, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-26452-z
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-26452-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-26452-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-021-26452-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Judith A Bouman & Julien Riou & Sebastian Bonhoeffer & Roland R Regoes, 2021. "Estimating the cumulative incidence of SARS-CoV-2 with imperfect serological tests: Exploiting cutoff-free approaches," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(2), pages 1-19, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-26452-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.