IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v12y2021i1d10.1038_s41467-021-26067-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How social relationships shape moral wrongness judgments

Author

Listed:
  • Brian D. Earp

    (Yale University)

  • Killian L. McLoughlin

    (Yale University)

  • Joshua T. Monrad

    (Yale University)

  • Margaret S. Clark

    (Yale University)

  • Molly J. Crockett

    (Yale University)

Abstract

Judgments of whether an action is morally wrong depend on who is involved and the nature of their relationship. But how, when, and why social relationships shape moral judgments is not well understood. We provide evidence to address these questions, measuring cooperative expectations and moral wrongness judgments in the context of common social relationships such as romantic partners, housemates, and siblings. In a pre-registered study of 423 U.S. participants nationally representative for age, race, and gender, we show that people normatively expect different relationships to serve cooperative functions of care, hierarchy, reciprocity, and mating to varying degrees. In a second pre-registered study of 1,320 U.S. participants, these relationship-specific cooperative expectations (i.e., relational norms) enable highly precise out-of-sample predictions about the perceived moral wrongness of actions in the context of particular relationships. In this work, we show that this ‘relational norms’ model better predicts patterns of moral wrongness judgments across relationships than alternative models based on genetic relatedness, social closeness, or interdependence, demonstrating how the perceived morality of actions depends not only on the actions themselves, but also on the relational context in which those actions occur.

Suggested Citation

  • Brian D. Earp & Killian L. McLoughlin & Joshua T. Monrad & Margaret S. Clark & Molly J. Crockett, 2021. "How social relationships shape moral wrongness judgments," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-26067-4
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-26067-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-26067-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-021-26067-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yoo, Sunbin & Kumagai, Junya & Morita, Tamaki & Park, Y. Gina & Managi, Shunsuke, 2023. "Who to sacrifice? Modeling the driver’s dilemma," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    2. Xiaoxue Gao & Eshin Jolly & Hongbo Yu & Huiying Liu & Xiaolin Zhou & Luke J. Chang, 2024. "The psychological, computational, and neural foundations of indebtedness," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    3. Shuqair, Saleh & Costa Pinto, Diego & Cruz-Jesus, Frederico & Mattila, Anna S. & da Fonseca Guerreiro, Patricia & Kam Fung So, Kevin, 2022. "Can customer relationships backfire? How relationship norms shape moral obligation in cancelation behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 463-472.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-26067-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.