IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v12y2021i1d10.1038_s41467-021-25904-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Replication stress biomarker is associated with response to gemcitabine versus combined gemcitabine and ATR inhibitor therapy in ovarian cancer

Author

Listed:
  • Panagiotis A. Konstantinopoulos

    (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute)

  • Alexandre André B. A. Costa

    (AC Camargo Cancer Center)

  • Doga Gulhan

    (Department of Biomedical Informatics and Ludwig Center at Harvard, Harvard Medical School)

  • Elizabeth K. Lee

    (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute)

  • Su-Chun Cheng

    (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute)

  • Andrea E. Wahner Hendrickson

    (Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic)

  • Bose Kochupurakkal

    (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
    Dana-Farber Cancer Institute)

  • David L. Kolin

    (Brigham and Women’s Hospital)

  • Elise C. Kohn

    (National Cancer Institute)

  • Joyce F. Liu

    (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute)

  • Elizabeth H. Stover

    (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute)

  • Jennifer Curtis

    (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute)

  • Nabihah Tayob

    (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute)

  • Madeline Polak

    (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute)

  • Dipanjan Chowdhury

    (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute)

  • Ursula A. Matulonis

    (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute)

  • Anniina Färkkilä

    (University of Helsinki)

  • Alan D. D’Andrea

    (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
    Dana-Farber Cancer Institute)

  • Geoffrey I. Shapiro

    (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute)

Abstract

In a trial of patients with high grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC), addition of the ATR inhibitor berzosertib to gemcitabine improved progression free survival (PFS) compared to gemcitabine alone but biomarkers predictive of treatment are lacking. Here we report a candidate biomarker of response to gemcitabine versus combined gemcitabine and ATR inhibitor therapy in HGSOC ovarian cancer. Patients with replication stress (RS)-high tumors (n = 27), defined as harboring at least one genomic RS alteration related to loss of RB pathway regulation and/or oncogene-induced replication stress achieve significantly prolonged PFS (HR = 0.38, 90% CI, 0.17–0.86) on gemcitabine monotherapy compared to those with tumors without such alterations (defined as RS-low, n = 30). However, addition of berzosertib to gemcitabine benefits only patients with RS-low tumors (gemcitabine/berzosertib HR 0.34, 90% CI, 0.13–0.86) and not patients with RS-high tumors (HR 1.11, 90% CI, 0.47–2.62). Our findings support the notion that the exacerbation of RS by gemcitabine monotherapy is adequate for lethality in RS-high tumors. Conversely, for RS-low tumors addition of berzosertib-mediated ATR inhibition to gemcitabine is necessary for lethality to occur. Independent prospective validation of this biomarker is required.

Suggested Citation

  • Panagiotis A. Konstantinopoulos & Alexandre André B. A. Costa & Doga Gulhan & Elizabeth K. Lee & Su-Chun Cheng & Andrea E. Wahner Hendrickson & Bose Kochupurakkal & David L. Kolin & Elise C. Kohn & Jo, 2021. "A Replication stress biomarker is associated with response to gemcitabine versus combined gemcitabine and ATR inhibitor therapy in ovarian cancer," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-8, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-25904-w
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-25904-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-25904-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-021-25904-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elena Giudice & Tzu-Ting Huang & Jayakumar R. Nair & Grant Zurcher & Ann McCoy & Darryl Nousome & Marc R. Radke & Elizabeth M. Swisher & Stanley Lipkowitz & Kristen Ibanez & Duncan Donohue & Tyler Mal, 2024. "The CHK1 inhibitor prexasertib in BRCA wild-type platinum-resistant recurrent high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma: a phase 2 trial," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Hanrui Zhang & Julian Kreis & Sven-Eric Schelhorn & Heike Dahmen & Thomas Grombacher & Michael Zühlsdorf & Frank T. Zenke & Yuanfang Guan, 2023. "Mapping combinatorial drug effects to DNA damage response kinase inhibitors," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-8, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-25904-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.