Author
Listed:
- Kamrine E. Poels
(Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
Dana Farber Cancer Institute)
- Adam J. Schoenfeld
(Weill Cornell Medical College)
- Alex Makhnin
(Weill Cornell Medical College)
- Yosef Tobi
(Weill Cornell Medical College)
- Yuli Wang
(Pfizer Inc)
- Heidie Frisco-Cabanos
(Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center)
- Shaon Chakrabarti
(Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
Dana Farber Cancer Institute
Harvard University)
- Manli Shi
(Pfizer Inc)
- Chelsi Napoli
(Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center)
- Thomas O. McDonald
(Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
Dana Farber Cancer Institute
Harvard University
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute)
- Weiwei Tan
(Pfizer Inc)
- Aaron Hata
(Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center
The Ludwig Center at Harvard
Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School)
- Scott L. Weinrich
(Pfizer Inc)
- Helena A. Yu
(Weill Cornell Medical College)
- Franziska Michor
(Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
Dana Farber Cancer Institute
Harvard University
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute)
Abstract
Despite the clinical success of the third-generation EGFR inhibitor osimertinib as a first-line treatment of EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), resistance arises due to the acquisition of EGFR second-site mutations and other mechanisms, which necessitates alternative therapies. Dacomitinib, a pan-HER inhibitor, is approved for first-line treatment and results in different acquired EGFR mutations than osimertinib that mediate on-target resistance. A combination of osimertinib and dacomitinib could therefore induce more durable responses by preventing the emergence of resistance. Here we present an integrated computational modeling and experimental approach to identify an optimal dosing schedule for osimertinib and dacomitinib combination therapy. We developed a predictive model that encompasses tumor heterogeneity and inter-subject pharmacokinetic variability to predict tumor evolution under different dosing schedules, parameterized using in vitro dose-response data. This model was validated using cell line data and used to identify an optimal combination dosing schedule. Our schedule was subsequently confirmed tolerable in an ongoing dose-escalation phase I clinical trial (NCT03810807), with some dose modifications, demonstrating that our rational modeling approach can be used to identify appropriate dosing for combination therapy in the clinical setting.
Suggested Citation
Kamrine E. Poels & Adam J. Schoenfeld & Alex Makhnin & Yosef Tobi & Yuli Wang & Heidie Frisco-Cabanos & Shaon Chakrabarti & Manli Shi & Chelsi Napoli & Thomas O. McDonald & Weiwei Tan & Aaron Hata & S, 2021.
"Identification of optimal dosing schedules of dacomitinib and osimertinib for a phase I/II trial in advanced EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer,"
Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:natcom:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-23912-4
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-23912-4
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-23912-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.