IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v12y2021i1d10.1038_s41467-021-23761-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimizing vaccine allocation for COVID-19 vaccines shows the potential role of single-dose vaccination

Author

Listed:
  • Laura Matrajt

    (Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center)

  • Julia Eaton

    (School of Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences, University of Washington)

  • Tiffany Leung

    (Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center)

  • Dobromir Dimitrov

    (Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
    Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Washington)

  • Joshua T. Schiffer

    (Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
    Department of Medicine, University of Washington
    Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center)

  • David A. Swan

    (Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center)

  • Holly Janes

    (Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center)

Abstract

Most COVID-19 vaccines require two doses, however with limited vaccine supply, policymakers are considering single-dose vaccination as an alternative strategy. Using a mathematical model combined with optimization algorithms, we determined optimal allocation strategies with one and two doses of vaccine under various degrees of viral transmission. Under low transmission, we show that the optimal allocation of vaccine vitally depends on the single-dose efficacy. With high single-dose efficacy, single-dose vaccination is optimal, preventing up to 22% more deaths than a strategy prioritizing two-dose vaccination for older adults. With low or moderate single-dose efficacy, mixed vaccination campaigns with complete coverage of older adults are optimal. However, with modest or high transmission, vaccinating older adults first with two doses is best, preventing up to 41% more deaths than a single-dose vaccination given across all adult populations. Our work suggests that it is imperative to determine the efficacy and durability of single-dose vaccines, as mixed or single-dose vaccination campaigns may have the potential to contain the pandemic much more quickly.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura Matrajt & Julia Eaton & Tiffany Leung & Dobromir Dimitrov & Joshua T. Schiffer & David A. Swan & Holly Janes, 2021. "Optimizing vaccine allocation for COVID-19 vaccines shows the potential role of single-dose vaccination," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-23761-1
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-23761-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-23761-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-021-23761-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Matt D. T. Hitchings & Otavio T. Ranzani & Murilo Dorion & Tatiana Lang D’Agostini & Regiane Cardoso de Paula & Olivia Ferreira Pereira de Paula & Edlaine Faria de Moura Villela & Mario Sergio Scaramu, 2021. "Effectiveness of ChAdOx1 vaccine in older adults during SARS-CoV-2 Gamma variant circulation in São Paulo," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-8, December.
    2. Emanuele Blasioli & Bahareh Mansouri & Srinivas Subramanya Tamvada & Elkafi Hassini, 2023. "Vaccine Allocation and Distribution: A Review with a Focus on Quantitative Methodologies and Application to Equity, Hesitancy, and COVID-19 Pandemic," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 1-32, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-23761-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.