Author
Listed:
- Charlotte Koschnick
(Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research
Department of Chemistry, University of Munich
e-conversion
Center for Nanoscience)
- Robert Stäglich
(University of Bayreuth
North Bavarian NMR Center)
- Tanja Scholz
(Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research)
- Maxwell W. Terban
(Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research)
- Alberto Mankowski
(Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research
Department of Chemistry, University of Munich
e-conversion
Center for Nanoscience)
- Gökcen Savasci
(Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research
Department of Chemistry, University of Munich
Center for Nanoscience)
- Florian Binder
(Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research
Department of Chemistry, University of Munich)
- Alexander Schökel
(Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron (DESY))
- Martin Etter
(Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron (DESY))
- Jürgen Nuss
(Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research)
- Renée Siegel
(University of Bayreuth
North Bavarian NMR Center)
- Luzia S. Germann
(Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research
McGill University)
- Christian Ochsenfeld
(Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research
Department of Chemistry, University of Munich
Center for Nanoscience)
- Robert E. Dinnebier
(Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research)
- Jürgen Senker
(University of Bayreuth
North Bavarian NMR Center)
- Bettina V. Lotsch
(Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research
Department of Chemistry, University of Munich
e-conversion
Center for Nanoscience)
Abstract
Porphyrin-based metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), exemplified by MOF-525, PCN-221, and PCN-224, are promising systems for catalysis, optoelectronics, and solar energy conversion. However, subtle differences between synthetic protocols for these three MOFs give rise to vast discrepancies in purported product outcomes and description of framework topologies. Here, based on a comprehensive synthetic and structural analysis spanning local and long-range length scales, we show that PCN-221 consists of Zr6O4(OH)4 clusters in four distinct orientations within the unit cell, rather than Zr8O6 clusters as originally published, and linker vacancies at levels of around 50%, which may form in a locally correlated manner. We propose disordered PCN-224 (dPCN-224) as a unified model to understand PCN-221, MOF-525, and PCN-224 by varying the degree of orientational cluster disorder, linker conformation and vacancies, and cluster–linker binding. Our work thus introduces a new perspective on network topology and disorder in Zr-MOFs and pinpoints the structural variables that direct their functional properties.
Suggested Citation
Charlotte Koschnick & Robert Stäglich & Tanja Scholz & Maxwell W. Terban & Alberto Mankowski & Gökcen Savasci & Florian Binder & Alexander Schökel & Martin Etter & Jürgen Nuss & Renée Siegel & Luzia S, 2021.
"Understanding disorder and linker deficiency in porphyrinic zirconium-based metal–organic frameworks by resolving the Zr8O6 cluster conundrum in PCN-221,"
Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-9, December.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:natcom:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-23348-w
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-23348-w
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-23348-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.