IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v12y2021i1d10.1038_s41467-021-23228-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Global effects of land-use intensity on local pollinator biodiversity

Author

Listed:
  • Joseph Millard

    (University College London
    Zoological Society of London)

  • Charlotte L. Outhwaite

    (University College London)

  • Robyn Kinnersley

    (University College London)

  • Robin Freeman

    (Zoological Society of London)

  • Richard D. Gregory

    (University College London
    The Lodge)

  • Opeyemi Adedoja

    (Cape Peninsula University of Technology)

  • Sabrina Gavini

    (INIBIOMA, CONICET-Universidad Nacional del Comahue)

  • Esther Kioko

    (National Museums of Kenya (NMK))

  • Michael Kuhlmann

    (Kiel University
    Natural History Museum)

  • Jeff Ollerton

    (University of Northampton)

  • Zong-Xin Ren

    (Chinese Academy of Sciences)

  • Tim Newbold

    (University College London)

Abstract

Pollinating species are in decline globally, with land use an important driver. However, most of the evidence on which these claims are made is patchy, based on studies with low taxonomic and geographic representativeness. Here, we model the effect of land-use type and intensity on global pollinator biodiversity, using a local-scale database covering 303 studies, 12,170 sites, and 4502 pollinating species. Relative to a primary vegetation baseline, we show that low levels of intensity can have beneficial effects on pollinator biodiversity. Within most anthropogenic land-use types however, increasing intensity is associated with significant reductions, particularly in urban (43% richness and 62% abundance reduction compared to the least intensive urban sites), and pasture (75% abundance reduction) areas. We further show that on cropland, the strongly negative response to intensity is restricted to tropical areas, and that the direction and magnitude of response differs among taxonomic groups. Our findings confirm widespread effects of land-use intensity on pollinators, most significantly in the tropics, where land use is predicted to change rapidly.

Suggested Citation

  • Joseph Millard & Charlotte L. Outhwaite & Robyn Kinnersley & Robin Freeman & Richard D. Gregory & Opeyemi Adedoja & Sabrina Gavini & Esther Kioko & Michael Kuhlmann & Jeff Ollerton & Zong-Xin Ren & Ti, 2021. "Global effects of land-use intensity on local pollinator biodiversity," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-23228-3
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-23228-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-23228-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-021-23228-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rob Roggema & Nico Tillie, 2022. "Realizing Emergent Ecologies: Nature-Based Solutions from Design to Implementation," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, November.
    2. José Luis Molina-Pardo & Emilio Rodríguez-Caballero & Miguel Cueto & Pablo Barranco & Manuel Sánchez-Robles & Azucena Laguía-Allué & Esther Giménez-Luque, 2021. "Effects of Agricultural Use on Endangered Plant Taxa in Spain," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-25, November.
    3. Simon P. K. Bowring & Wei Li & Florent Mouillot & Thais M. Rosan & Philippe Ciais, 2024. "Road fragment edges enhance wildfire incidence and intensity, while suppressing global burned area," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-23228-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.