Author
Listed:
- Xuanze Zhang
(Key Laboratory of Water Cycle and Related Land Surface Processes, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences
East China Normal University)
- Ying-Ping Wang
(Terrestrial Biogeochemistry Group, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences
CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, Private Bag 1)
- Peter J. Rayner
(University of Melbourne)
- Philippe Ciais
(Université Paris-Saclay)
- Kun Huang
(East China Normal University)
- Yiqi Luo
(Northern Arizona University)
- Shilong Piao
(Peking University)
- Zhonglei Wang
(Xiamen University)
- Jianyang Xia
(East China Normal University)
- Wei Zhao
(National Meteorological Center, China Meteorological Administration)
- Xiaogu Zheng
(Key Laboratory of Regional Climate-Environment Research for East Asia, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences)
- Jing Tian
(Key Laboratory of Water Cycle and Related Land Surface Processes, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences)
- Yongqiang Zhang
(Key Laboratory of Water Cycle and Related Land Surface Processes, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences)
Abstract
The climate-carbon cycle feedback is one of the most important climate-amplifying feedbacks of the Earth system, and is quantified as a function of carbon-concentration feedback parameter (β) and carbon-climate feedback parameter (γ). However, the global climate-amplifying effect from this feedback loop (determined by the gain factor, g) has not been quantified from observations. Here we apply a Fourier analysis-based carbon cycle feedback framework to the reconstructed records from 1850 to 2017 and 1000 to 1850 to estimate β and γ. We show that the β-feedback varies by less than 10% with an average of 3.22 ± 0.32 GtC ppm−1 for 1880–2017, whereas the γ-feedback increases from −33 ± 14 GtC K−1 on a decadal scale to −122 ± 60 GtC K−1 on a centennial scale for 1000–1850. Feedback analysis further reveals that the current amplification effect from the carbon cycle feedback is small (g is 0.01 ± 0.05), which is much lower than the estimates by the advanced Earth system models (g is 0.09 ± 0.04 for the historical period and is 0.15 ± 0.08 for the RCP8.5 scenario), implying that the future allowable CO2 emissions could be 9 ± 7% more. Therefore, our findings provide new insights about the strength of climate-carbon cycle feedback and about observational constraints on models for projecting future climate.
Suggested Citation
Xuanze Zhang & Ying-Ping Wang & Peter J. Rayner & Philippe Ciais & Kun Huang & Yiqi Luo & Shilong Piao & Zhonglei Wang & Jianyang Xia & Wei Zhao & Xiaogu Zheng & Jing Tian & Yongqiang Zhang, 2021.
"A small climate-amplifying effect of climate-carbon cycle feedback,"
Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11, December.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:natcom:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-22392-w
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-22392-w
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-22392-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.