IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v12y2021i1d10.1038_s41467-021-22225-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The white matter is a pro-differentiative niche for glioblastoma

Author

Listed:
  • Lucy J. Brooks

    (UCL Cancer Institute)

  • Melanie P. Clements

    (UCL Cancer Institute)

  • Jemima J. Burden

    (University College London)

  • Daniela Kocher

    (UCL Cancer Institute)

  • Luca Richards

    (UCL Cancer Institute)

  • Sara Castro Devesa

    (UCL Cancer Institute)

  • Leila Zakka

    (UCL Cancer Institute)

  • Megan Woodberry

    (UCL Cancer Institute)

  • Michael Ellis

    (UCL Cancer Institute)

  • Zane Jaunmuktane

    (University College London NHS Foundation Trust
    UCL Institute of Neurology)

  • Sebastian Brandner

    (University College London NHS Foundation Trust
    UCL Institute of Neurology)

  • Gillian Morrison

    (University of Edinburgh)

  • Steven M. Pollard

    (University of Edinburgh)

  • Peter B. Dirks

    (Hospital for Sick Children)

  • Samuel Marguerat

    (MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences
    Imperial College London)

  • Simona Parrinello

    (UCL Cancer Institute)

Abstract

Glioblastomas are hierarchically organised tumours driven by glioma stem cells that retain partial differentiation potential. Glioma stem cells are maintained in specialised microenvironments, but whether, or how, they undergo lineage progression outside of these niches remains unclear. Here we identify the white matter as a differentiative niche for glioblastomas with oligodendrocyte lineage competency. Tumour cells in contact with white matter acquire pre-oligodendrocyte fate, resulting in decreased proliferation and invasion. Differentiation is a response to white matter injury, which is caused by tumour infiltration itself in a tumoursuppressive feedback loop. Mechanistically, tumour cell differentiation is driven by selective white matter upregulation of SOX10, a master regulator of normal oligodendrogenesis. SOX10 overexpression or treatment with myelination-promoting agents that upregulate endogenous SOX10, mimic this response, leading to niche-independent pre-oligodendrocyte differentiation and tumour suppression in vivo. Thus, glioblastoma recapitulates an injury response and exploiting this latent programme may offer treatment opportunities for a subset of patients.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucy J. Brooks & Melanie P. Clements & Jemima J. Burden & Daniela Kocher & Luca Richards & Sara Castro Devesa & Leila Zakka & Megan Woodberry & Michael Ellis & Zane Jaunmuktane & Sebastian Brandner & , 2021. "The white matter is a pro-differentiative niche for glioblastoma," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-22225-w
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-22225-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-22225-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-021-22225-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marc Cicero Schubert & Stella Judith Soyka & Amr Tamimi & Emanuel Maus & Julian Schroers & Niklas Wißmann & Ekin Reyhan & Svenja Kristin Tetzlaff & Yvonne Yang & Robert Denninger & Robin Peretzke & Ca, 2024. "Deep intravital brain tumor imaging enabled by tailored three-photon microscopy and analysis," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-21, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-22225-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.