IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v11y2020i1d10.1038_s41467-020-20039-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The default network of the human brain is associated with perceived social isolation

Author

Listed:
  • R. Nathan Spreng

    (McGill University
    McGill University
    Douglas Mental Health University Institute
    Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI), McGill University)

  • Emile Dimas

    (McGill University)

  • Laetitia Mwilambwe-Tshilobo

    (McGill University)

  • Alain Dagher

    (Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI), McGill University)

  • Philipp Koellinger

    (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)

  • Gideon Nave

    (University of Pennsylvania)

  • Anthony Ong

    (Cornell University
    Division of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College)

  • Julius M. Kernbach

    (RWTH Aachen University Hospital)

  • Thomas V. Wiecki

    (Quantopian Inc.)

  • Tian Ge

    (Massachusetts General Hospital
    Harvard Medical School
    Massachusetts General Hospital
    Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard)

  • Yue Li

    (McGill University)

  • Avram J. Holmes

    (Yale University)

  • B. T. Thomas Yeo

    (National University of Singapore)

  • Gary R. Turner

    (York University)

  • Robin I. M. Dunbar

    (University of Oxford)

  • Danilo Bzdok

    (Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI), McGill University
    McGill University
    McGill University
    Mila - Quebec Artificial Intelligence Institute)

Abstract

Humans survive and thrive through social exchange. Yet, social dependency also comes at a cost. Perceived social isolation, or loneliness, affects physical and mental health, cognitive performance, overall life expectancy, and increases vulnerability to Alzheimer’s disease-related dementias. Despite severe consequences on behavior and health, the neural basis of loneliness remains elusive. Using the UK Biobank population imaging-genetics cohort (n = ~40,000, aged 40–69 years when recruited, mean age = 54.9), we test for signatures of loneliness in grey matter morphology, intrinsic functional coupling, and fiber tract microstructure. The loneliness-linked neurobiological profiles converge on a collection of brain regions known as the ‘default network’. This higher associative network shows more consistent loneliness associations in grey matter volume than other cortical brain networks. Lonely individuals display stronger functional communication in the default network, and greater microstructural integrity of its fornix pathway. The findings fit with the possibility that the up-regulation of these neural circuits supports mentalizing, reminiscence and imagination to fill the social void.

Suggested Citation

  • R. Nathan Spreng & Emile Dimas & Laetitia Mwilambwe-Tshilobo & Alain Dagher & Philipp Koellinger & Gideon Nave & Anthony Ong & Julius M. Kernbach & Thomas V. Wiecki & Tian Ge & Yue Li & Avram J. Holme, 2020. "The default network of the human brain is associated with perceived social isolation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:11:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-020-20039-w
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-20039-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-20039-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-020-20039-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Danilo Bzdok & Robin I. M. Dunbar, 2022. "Social isolation and the brain in the pandemic era," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 6(10), pages 1333-1343, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:11:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-020-20039-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.