IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v11y2020i1d10.1038_s41467-020-19965-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Neoadjuvant FLOT versus SOX phase II randomized clinical trial for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer

Author

Listed:
  • Birendra Kumar Sah

    (Department of General Surgery, Gastrointestinal Surgery Unit, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery)

  • Benyan Zhang

    (Department of Pathology Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine)

  • Huan Zhang

    (Department of Radiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine)

  • Jian Li

    (Clinical Research Center, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine)

  • Fei Yuan

    (Department of Pathology Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine)

  • Tao Ma

    (Department of Medical Oncology Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine)

  • Min Shi

    (Department of Medical Oncology Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine)

  • Wei Xu

    (Department of General Surgery, Gastrointestinal Surgery Unit, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery)

  • Zhenglun Zhu

    (Department of General Surgery, Gastrointestinal Surgery Unit, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery)

  • Wentao Liu

    (Department of General Surgery, Gastrointestinal Surgery Unit, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery)

  • Chao Yan

    (Department of General Surgery, Gastrointestinal Surgery Unit, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery)

  • Chen Li

    (Department of General Surgery, Gastrointestinal Surgery Unit, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery)

  • Bingya Liu

    (Department of General Surgery, Gastrointestinal Surgery Unit, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery)

  • Min Yan

    (Department of General Surgery, Gastrointestinal Surgery Unit, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery)

  • Zhenggang Zhu

    (Department of General Surgery, Gastrointestinal Surgery Unit, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery)

Abstract

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel, oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FLOT regimen) has shown promising results in terms of pathological response and survival rate in patients with locally advanced resectable gastric cancer (LAGC). However, tegafur gimeracil oteracil potassium capsule (S-1) plus oxaliplatin (SOX regimen) is the preferred chemotherapy regimen in Eastern countries. Here, we conduct an open label, two-arm, phase II randomized interventional clinical trial (Dragon III; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03636893) to evaluate the safety and efficacy of both regimens. Patients with LAGC are randomly assigned to receive either 4 cycles of the neoadjuvant FLOT regimen (40 patients) or 3 cycles of the SOX regimen (34 patients) before gastrectomy. The primary endpoint is the comparison of complete (TRG1a) or subtotal (TRG1b) tumor regression grading in the primary tumor. There are no significant differences in adverse effects or postoperative morbidity and mortality between the two groups. No significant differences in the proportion of tumor regression grading between the FLOT group and the SOX group are found. Complete or subtotal TRG is 20.0% in the FLOT group versus 32.4% in the SOX group. Therefore, our study does not find statistically significant differences between neoadjuvant FLOT and SOX regimens for the primary outcomes reported here in locally advanced gastric cancer.

Suggested Citation

  • Birendra Kumar Sah & Benyan Zhang & Huan Zhang & Jian Li & Fei Yuan & Tao Ma & Min Shi & Wei Xu & Zhenglun Zhu & Wentao Liu & Chao Yan & Chen Li & Bingya Liu & Min Yan & Zhenggang Zhu, 2020. "Neoadjuvant FLOT versus SOX phase II randomized clinical trial for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-8, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:11:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-020-19965-6
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-19965-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-19965-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-020-19965-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:11:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-020-19965-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.