IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v11y2020i1d10.1038_s41467-020-19688-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Common and distinct neural representations of aversive somatic and visceral stimulation in healthy individuals

Author

Listed:
  • Lukas Van Oudenhove

    (KU Leuven
    KU Leuven
    Dartmouth College)

  • Philip A. Kragel

    (University of Colorado Boulder
    Emory University)

  • Patrick Dupont

    (KU Leuven)

  • Huynh Giao Ly

    (KU Leuven)

  • Els Pazmany

    (University of Leuven)

  • Paul Enzlin

    (University of Leuven)

  • Amandine Rubio

    (University of Grenoble Alpes)

  • Chantal Delon-Martin

    (University of Grenoble Alpes)

  • Bruno Bonaz

    (University of Grenoble Alpes)

  • Qasim Aziz

    (Queen Mary University of London)

  • Jan Tack

    (KU Leuven)

  • Shin Fukudo

    (Tohoku University)

  • Michiko Kano

    (Tohoku University
    Tohoku University)

  • Tor D. Wager

    (Dartmouth College)

Abstract

Different pain types may be encoded in different brain circuits. Here, we examine similarities and differences in brain processing of visceral and somatic pain. We analyze data from seven fMRI studies (N = 165) and five types of pain and discomfort (esophageal, gastric, and rectal distension, cutaneous thermal stimulation, and vulvar pressure) to establish and validate generalizable pain representations. We first evaluate an established multivariate brain measure, the Neurologic Pain Signature (NPS), as a common nociceptive pain system across pain types. Then, we develop a multivariate classifier to distinguish visceral from somatic pain. The NPS responds robustly in 98% of participants across pain types, correlates with perceived intensity of visceral pain and discomfort, and shows specificity to pain when compared with cognitive and affective conditions from twelve additional studies (N = 180). Pre-defined signatures for non-pain negative affect do not respond to visceral pain. The visceral versus the somatic classifier reliably distinguishes somatic (thermal) from visceral (rectal) stimulation in both cross-validation and independent cohorts. Other pain types reflect mixtures of somatic and visceral patterns. These results validate the NPS as measuring a common core nociceptive pain system across pain types, and provide a new classifier for visceral versus somatic pain.

Suggested Citation

  • Lukas Van Oudenhove & Philip A. Kragel & Patrick Dupont & Huynh Giao Ly & Els Pazmany & Paul Enzlin & Amandine Rubio & Chantal Delon-Martin & Bruno Bonaz & Qasim Aziz & Jan Tack & Shin Fukudo & Michik, 2020. "Common and distinct neural representations of aversive somatic and visceral stimulation in healthy individuals," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:11:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-020-19688-8
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-19688-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-19688-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-020-19688-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ahmad Mayeli & Obada Al Zoubi & Evan J. White & Sheridan Chappelle & Rayus Kuplicki & Alexa Morton & Jaimee Bruce & Ryan Smith & Justin S. Feinstein & Jerzy Bodurka & Martin P. Paulus & Sahib S. Khals, 2023. "Parieto-occipital ERP indicators of gut mechanosensation in humans," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:11:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-020-19688-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.