IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v11y2020i1d10.1038_s41467-020-19428-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-year incubation experiments boost confidence in model projections of long-term soil carbon dynamics

Author

Listed:
  • Siyang Jian

    (Tennessee State University
    Institute for Environmental Genomics and Department of Microbiology & Plant Biology, University of Oklahoma)

  • Jianwei Li

    (Tennessee State University)

  • Gangsheng Wang

    (State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Sciences, Wuhan University)

  • Laurel A. Kluber

    (Biosciences Division & Climate Change Science Institute, Oak Ridge National Laboratory)

  • Christopher W. Schadt

    (Biosciences Division & Climate Change Science Institute, Oak Ridge National Laboratory)

  • Junyi Liang

    (Environmental Division & Climate Change Science Institute, Oak Ridge National Laboratory
    College of Grassland Science and Technology, China Agricultural University)

  • Melanie A. Mayes

    (Environmental Division & Climate Change Science Institute, Oak Ridge National Laboratory)

Abstract

Global soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks may decline with a warmer climate. However, model projections of changes in SOC due to climate warming depend on microbially-driven processes that are usually parameterized based on laboratory incubations. To assess how lab-scale incubation datasets inform model projections over decades, we optimized five microbially-relevant parameters in the Microbial-ENzyme Decomposition (MEND) model using 16 short-term glucose (6-day), 16 short-term cellulose (30-day) and 16 long-term cellulose (729-day) incubation datasets with soils from forests and grasslands across contrasting soil types. Our analysis identified consistently higher parameter estimates given the short-term versus long-term datasets. Implementing the short-term and long-term parameters, respectively, resulted in SOC loss (–8.2 ± 5.1% or –3.9 ± 2.8%), and minor SOC gain (1.8 ± 1.0%) in response to 5 °C warming, while only the latter is consistent with a meta-analysis of 149 field warming observations (1.6 ± 4.0%). Comparing multiple subsets of cellulose incubations (i.e., 6, 30, 90, 180, 360, 480 and 729-day) revealed comparable projections to the observed long-term SOC changes under warming only on 480- and 729-day. Integrating multi-year datasets of soil incubations (e.g., > 1.5 years) with microbial models can thus achieve more reasonable parameterization of key microbial processes and subsequently boost the accuracy and confidence of long-term SOC projections.

Suggested Citation

  • Siyang Jian & Jianwei Li & Gangsheng Wang & Laurel A. Kluber & Christopher W. Schadt & Junyi Liang & Melanie A. Mayes, 2020. "Multi-year incubation experiments boost confidence in model projections of long-term soil carbon dynamics," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-9, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:11:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-020-19428-y
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-19428-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-19428-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-020-19428-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:11:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-020-19428-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.