Author
Listed:
- Andrea Walens
(Duke University)
- Jiaxing Lin
(Duke University)
- Jeffrey S. Damrauer
(Duke University)
- Brock McKinney
(Duke University)
- Ryan Lupo
(Duke University)
- Rachel Newcomb
(Duke University)
- Douglas B. Fox
(Duke University)
- Nathaniel W. Mabe
(Duke University)
- Jeremy Gresham
(Duke University)
- Zhecheng Sheng
(Duke University)
- Alexander B. Sibley
(Duke University)
- Tristan De Buysscher
(University of North Carolina
University of North Carolina)
- Hemant Kelkar
(University of North Carolina)
- Piotr A. Mieczkowski
(University of North Carolina
University of North Carolina)
- Kouros Owzar
(Duke University
Duke University)
- James V. Alvarez
(Duke University)
Abstract
The survival and recurrence of residual tumor cells following therapy constitutes one of the biggest obstacles to obtaining cures in breast cancer, but it remains unclear how the clonal composition of tumors changes during relapse. We use cellular barcoding to monitor clonal dynamics during tumor recurrence in vivo. We find that clonal diversity decreases during tumor regression, residual disease, and recurrence. The recurrence of dormant residual cells follows several distinct routes. Approximately half of the recurrent tumors exhibit clonal dominance with a small number of subclones comprising the vast majority of the tumor; these clonal recurrences are frequently dependent upon Met gene amplification. A second group of recurrent tumors comprises thousands of subclones, has a clonal architecture similar to primary tumors, and is dependent upon the Jak/Stat pathway. Thus the regrowth of dormant tumors proceeds via multiple routes, producing recurrent tumors with distinct clonal composition, genetic alterations, and drug sensitivities.
Suggested Citation
Andrea Walens & Jiaxing Lin & Jeffrey S. Damrauer & Brock McKinney & Ryan Lupo & Rachel Newcomb & Douglas B. Fox & Nathaniel W. Mabe & Jeremy Gresham & Zhecheng Sheng & Alexander B. Sibley & Tristan D, 2020.
"Adaptation and selection shape clonal evolution of tumors during residual disease and recurrence,"
Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:natcom:v:11:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-020-18730-z
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-18730-z
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:11:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-020-18730-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.