IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v11y2020i1d10.1038_s41467-020-18675-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A strategy to incorporate prior knowledge into correlation network cutoff selection

Author

Listed:
  • Elisa Benedetti

    (Institute of Computational Biology, Helmholtz Center Munich - German Research Center for Environmental Health
    Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Weill Cornell Medicine, Institute for Computational Biomedicine, Englander Institute for Precision Medicine)

  • Maja Pučić-Baković

    (Genos Glycoscience Research Laboratory)

  • Toma Keser

    (University of Zagreb)

  • Nathalie Gerstner

    (Institute of Computational Biology, Helmholtz Center Munich - German Research Center for Environmental Health
    Max Planck Institute for Psychiatry)

  • Mustafa Büyüközkan

    (Institute of Computational Biology, Helmholtz Center Munich - German Research Center for Environmental Health
    Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Weill Cornell Medicine, Institute for Computational Biomedicine, Englander Institute for Precision Medicine)

  • Tamara Štambuk

    (Genos Glycoscience Research Laboratory)

  • Maurice H. J. Selman

    (Leiden University Medical Center)

  • Igor Rudan

    (University of Edinburgh)

  • Ozren Polašek

    (University of Split School of Medicine
    Gen-info Ltd.)

  • Caroline Hayward

    (University of Edinburgh)

  • Hassen Al-Amin

    (Weill Cornell Medicine in Qatar)

  • Karsten Suhre

    (Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Weill Cornell Medical College in Qatar, Education City)

  • Gabi Kastenmüller

    (Institute of Computational Biology, Helmholtz Center Munich - German Research Center for Environmental Health)

  • Gordan Lauc

    (Genos Glycoscience Research Laboratory
    University of Zagreb)

  • Jan Krumsiek

    (Institute of Computational Biology, Helmholtz Center Munich - German Research Center for Environmental Health
    Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Weill Cornell Medicine, Institute for Computational Biomedicine, Englander Institute for Precision Medicine)

Abstract

Correlation networks are frequently used to statistically extract biological interactions between omics markers. Network edge selection is typically based on the statistical significance of the correlation coefficients. This procedure, however, is not guaranteed to capture biological mechanisms. We here propose an alternative approach for network reconstruction: a cutoff selection algorithm that maximizes the overlap of the inferred network with available prior knowledge. We first evaluate the approach on IgG glycomics data, for which the biochemical pathway is known and well-characterized. Importantly, even in the case of incomplete or incorrect prior knowledge, the optimal network is close to the true optimum. We then demonstrate the generalizability of the approach with applications to untargeted metabolomics and transcriptomics data. For the transcriptomics case, we demonstrate that the optimized network is superior to statistical networks in systematically retrieving interactions that were not included in the biological reference used for optimization.

Suggested Citation

  • Elisa Benedetti & Maja Pučić-Baković & Toma Keser & Nathalie Gerstner & Mustafa Büyüközkan & Tamara Štambuk & Maurice H. J. Selman & Igor Rudan & Ozren Polašek & Caroline Hayward & Hassen Al-Amin & Ka, 2020. "A strategy to incorporate prior knowledge into correlation network cutoff selection," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:11:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-020-18675-3
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-18675-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-18675-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-020-18675-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:11:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-020-18675-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.