IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v11y2020i1d10.1038_s41467-020-18151-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Retrospective evaluation of whole exome and genome mutation calls in 746 cancer samples

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew H. Bailey

    (The McDonnell Genome Institute at Washington University
    Washington University School of Medicine
    Washington University School of Medicine)

  • William U. Meyerson

    (Yale University
    Yale University)

  • Lewis Jonathan Dursi

    (Ontario Institute for Cancer Research
    The Hospital for Sick Children)

  • Liang-Bo Wang

    (The McDonnell Genome Institute at Washington University
    Washington University School of Medicine)

  • Guanlan Dong

    (Washington University School of Medicine)

  • Wen-Wei Liang

    (The McDonnell Genome Institute at Washington University
    Washington University School of Medicine)

  • Amila Weerasinghe

    (The McDonnell Genome Institute at Washington University
    Washington University School of Medicine)

  • Shantao Li

    (Yale University)

  • Yize Li

    (The McDonnell Genome Institute at Washington University)

  • Sean Kelso

    (Washington University School of Medicine)

  • Gordon Saksena

    (Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard)

  • Kyle Ellrott

    (Oregon Health and Science University)

  • Michael C. Wendl

    (The McDonnell Genome Institute at Washington University
    Washington University in St. Louis
    Washington University School of Medicine)

  • David A. Wheeler

    (Baylor College of Medicine
    Baylor College of Medicine)

  • Gad Getz

    (Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard
    Harvard Medical School
    Massachusetts General Hospital
    Massachusetts General Hospital)

  • Jared T. Simpson

    (Ontario Institute for Cancer Research
    University of Toronto)

  • Mark B. Gerstein

    (Yale University
    Yale University
    Yale University)

  • Li Ding

    (The McDonnell Genome Institute at Washington University
    Washington University School of Medicine
    Washington University School of Medicine
    Washington University School of Medicine)

Abstract

The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) curated consensus somatic mutation calls using whole exome sequencing (WES) and whole genome sequencing (WGS), respectively. Here, as part of the ICGC/TCGA Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes (PCAWG) Consortium, which aggregated whole genome sequencing data from 2,658 cancers across 38 tumour types, we compare WES and WGS side-by-side from 746 TCGA samples, finding that ~80% of mutations overlap in covered exonic regions. We estimate that low variant allele fraction (VAF

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew H. Bailey & William U. Meyerson & Lewis Jonathan Dursi & Liang-Bo Wang & Guanlan Dong & Wen-Wei Liang & Amila Weerasinghe & Shantao Li & Yize Li & Sean Kelso & Gordon Saksena & Kyle Ellrott & , 2020. "Retrospective evaluation of whole exome and genome mutation calls in 746 cancer samples," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-27, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:11:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-020-18151-y
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-18151-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-18151-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-020-18151-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michael Fraser & Julie Livingstone & Jeffrey L. Wrana & Antonio Finelli & Housheng Hansen He & Theodorus van der Kwast & Alexandre R. Zlotta & Robert G. Bristow & Paul C. Boutros, 2021. "Somatic driver mutation prevalence in 1844 prostate cancers identifies ZNRF3 loss as a predictor of metastatic relapse," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:11:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-020-18151-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.