IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v11y2020i1d10.1038_s41467-020-17672-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An optimal posttreatment surveillance strategy for cancer survivors based on an individualized risk-based approach

Author

Listed:
  • Guan-Qun Zhou

    (State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy
    Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center)

  • Chen-Fei Wu

    (Sun Yat-sen University)

  • Bin Deng

    (Wuzhou Red Cross Hospital)

  • Tian-Sheng Gao

    (Wuzhou Red Cross Hospital)

  • Jia-Wei Lv

    (State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy
    Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center)

  • Li Lin

    (State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy
    Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center)

  • Fo-ping Chen

    (State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy
    Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center)

  • Jia Kou

    (State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy
    Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center)

  • Zhao-Xi Zhang

    (Sun Yat-sen University)

  • Xiao-Dan Huang

    (State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy
    Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center)

  • Zi-Qi Zheng

    (State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy
    Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center)

  • Jun Ma

    (State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy
    Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center)

  • Jin-Hui Liang

    (Wuzhou Red Cross Hospital)

  • Ying Sun

    (State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy
    Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center)

Abstract

The optimal post-treatment surveillance strategy that can detect early recurrence of a cancer within limited visits remains unexplored. Here we adopt nasopharyngeal carcinoma as the study model to establish an approach to surveillance that balances the effectiveness of disease detection versus costs. A total of 7,043 newly-diagnosed patients are grouped according to a clinic-molecular risk grouping system. We use a random survival forest model to simulate the monthly probability of disease recurrence, and thereby establish risk-based surveillance arrangements that can maximize the efficacy of recurrence detection per visit. Markov decision-analytic models further validate that the risk-based surveillance outperforms the control strategies and is the most cost-effective. These results are confirmed in an external validation cohort. Finally, we recommend the risk-based surveillance arrangement which requires 10, 11, 13 and 14 visits for group I to IV. Our surveillance strategies might pave the way for individualized and economic surveillance for cancer survivors.

Suggested Citation

  • Guan-Qun Zhou & Chen-Fei Wu & Bin Deng & Tian-Sheng Gao & Jia-Wei Lv & Li Lin & Fo-ping Chen & Jia Kou & Zhao-Xi Zhang & Xiao-Dan Huang & Zi-Qi Zheng & Jun Ma & Jin-Hui Liang & Ying Sun, 2020. "An optimal posttreatment surveillance strategy for cancer survivors based on an individualized risk-based approach," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-9, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:11:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-020-17672-w
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-17672-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-17672-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-020-17672-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:11:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-020-17672-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.