Author
Listed:
- Cristina Sisu
(Yale University
Yale University
Brunel University London)
- Paul Muir
(Yale University
Yale University)
- Adam Frankish
(European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus)
- Ian Fiddes
(University of California)
- Mark Diekhans
(University of California)
- David Thybert
(European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus
Earlham Institute, Norwich Research Park)
- Duncan T. Odom
(University of Cambridge, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Robinson Way
Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus)
- Paul Flicek
(European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus
Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus)
- Thomas M. Keane
(European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus)
- Tim Hubbard
(King’s College London)
- Jennifer Harrow
(Elexir, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus)
- Mark Gerstein
(Yale University
Yale University
Yale University
Yale University)
Abstract
Pseudogenes are ideal markers of genome remodelling. In turn, the mouse is an ideal platform for studying them, particularly with the recent availability of strain-sequencing and transcriptional data. Here, combining both manual curation and automatic pipelines, we present a genome-wide annotation of the pseudogenes in the mouse reference genome and 18 inbred mouse strains (available via the mouse.pseudogene.org resource). We also annotate 165 unitary pseudogenes in mouse, and 303, in human. The overall pseudogene repertoire in mouse is similar to that in human in terms of size, biotype distribution, and family composition (e.g. with GAPDH and ribosomal proteins being the largest families). Notable differences arise in the pseudogene age distribution, with multiple retro-transpositional bursts in mouse evolutionary history and only one in human. Furthermore, in each strain about a fifth of all pseudogenes are unique, reflecting strain-specific evolution. Finally, we find that ~15% of the mouse pseudogenes are transcribed, and that highly transcribed parent genes tend to give rise to many processed pseudogenes.
Suggested Citation
Cristina Sisu & Paul Muir & Adam Frankish & Ian Fiddes & Mark Diekhans & David Thybert & Duncan T. Odom & Paul Flicek & Thomas M. Keane & Tim Hubbard & Jennifer Harrow & Mark Gerstein, 2020.
"Transcriptional activity and strain-specific history of mouse pseudogenes,"
Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:natcom:v:11:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-020-17157-w
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-17157-w
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:11:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-020-17157-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.