Author
Listed:
- David Comont
(Rothamsted Research)
- Claudia Lowe
(Rothamsted Research)
- Richard Hull
(Rothamsted Research)
- Laura Crook
(Rothamsted Research)
- Helen L. Hicks
(University of Sheffield
School of Animal, Rural and Environmental Sciences, Nottingham Trent University)
- Nawaporn Onkokesung
(Newcastle University)
- Roland Beffa
(Bayer Crop Science, Weed Resistance Research)
- Dylan Z. Childs
(University of Sheffield)
- Robert Edwards
(Newcastle University)
- Robert P. Freckleton
(University of Sheffield)
- Paul Neve
(Rothamsted Research
Agriculture & Horticulture Development Board)
Abstract
Intense selection by pesticides and antibiotics has resulted in a global epidemic of evolved resistance. In agriculture and medicine, using mixtures of compounds from different classes is widely accepted as optimal resistance management. However, this strategy may promote the evolution of more generalist resistance mechanisms. Here we test this hypothesis at a national scale in an economically important agricultural weed: blackgrass (Alopecurus myosuroides), for which herbicide resistance is a major economic issue. Our results reveal that greater use of herbicide mixtures is associated with lower levels of specialist resistance mechanisms, but higher levels of a generalist mechanism implicated in enhanced metabolism of herbicides with diverse modes of action. Our results indicate a potential evolutionary trade-off in resistance management, whereby attempts to reduce selection for specialist resistance traits may promote the evolution of generalist resistance. We contend that where specialist and generalist resistance mechanisms co-occur, similar trade-offs will be evident, calling into question the ubiquity of resistance management based on mixtures and combination therapies.
Suggested Citation
David Comont & Claudia Lowe & Richard Hull & Laura Crook & Helen L. Hicks & Nawaporn Onkokesung & Roland Beffa & Dylan Z. Childs & Robert Edwards & Robert P. Freckleton & Paul Neve, 2020.
"Evolution of generalist resistance to herbicide mixtures reveals a trade-off in resistance management,"
Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-9, December.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:natcom:v:11:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-020-16896-0
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-16896-0
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:11:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-020-16896-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.