Author
Listed:
- Li Ma
(University of Maryland)
- Aniket V. Gore
(Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH)
- Daniel Castranova
(Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH)
- Janet Shi
(University of Maryland)
- Mandy Ng
(University of Maryland)
- Kelly A. Tomins
(Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH
Stanford University, School of Medicine)
- Corine M. Weele
(University of Maryland)
- Brant M. Weinstein
(Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH)
- William R. Jeffery
(University of Maryland)
Abstract
Vestigial structures are key indicators of evolutionary descent, but the mechanisms underlying their development are poorly understood. This study examines vestigial eye formation in the teleost Astyanax mexicanus, which consists of a sighted surface-dwelling morph and multiple populations of blind cave morphs. Cavefish embryos initially develop eyes, but they subsequently degenerate and become vestigial structures embedded in the head. The mutated genes involved in cavefish vestigial eye formation have not been characterized. Here we identify cystathionine ß-synthase a (cbsa), which encodes the key enzyme of the transsulfuration pathway, as one of the mutated genes responsible for eye degeneration in multiple cavefish populations. The inactivation of cbsa affects eye development by increasing the transsulfuration intermediate homocysteine and inducing defects in optic vasculature, which result in aneurysms and eye hemorrhages. Our findings suggest that localized modifications in the circulatory system may have contributed to the evolution of vestigial eyes in cavefish.
Suggested Citation
Li Ma & Aniket V. Gore & Daniel Castranova & Janet Shi & Mandy Ng & Kelly A. Tomins & Corine M. Weele & Brant M. Weinstein & William R. Jeffery, 2020.
"A hypomorphic cystathionine ß-synthase gene contributes to cavefish eye loss by disrupting optic vasculature,"
Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:natcom:v:11:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-020-16497-x
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-16497-x
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:11:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-020-16497-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.