Author
Listed:
- Angel A. Ku
(University of California, San Francisco)
- Hsien-Ming Hu
(University of California, San Francisco)
- Xin Zhao
(University of California, San Francisco)
- Khyati N. Shah
(University of California, San Francisco)
- Sameera Kongara
(University of California, San Francisco)
- Di Wu
(University of California, San Francisco)
- Frank McCormick
(University of California, San Francisco)
- Allan Balmain
(University of California, San Francisco)
- Sourav Bandyopadhyay
(University of California, San Francisco
University of California, San Francisco)
Abstract
Synthetic lethal screens have the potential to identify new vulnerabilities incurred by specific cancer mutations but have been hindered by lack of agreement between studies. In the case of KRAS, we identify that published synthetic lethal screen hits significantly overlap at the pathway rather than gene level. Analysis of pathways encoded as protein networks could identify synthetic lethal candidates that are more reproducible than those previously reported. Lack of overlap likely stems from biological rather than technical limitations as most synthetic lethal phenotypes are strongly modulated by changes in cellular conditions or genetic context, the latter determined using a pairwise genetic interaction map that identifies numerous interactions that suppress synthetic lethal effects. Accounting for pathway, cellular and genetic context nominates a DNA repair dependency in KRAS-mutant cells, mediated by a network containing BRCA1. We provide evidence for why most reported synthetic lethals are not reproducible which is addressable using a multi-faceted testing framework.
Suggested Citation
Angel A. Ku & Hsien-Ming Hu & Xin Zhao & Khyati N. Shah & Sameera Kongara & Di Wu & Frank McCormick & Allan Balmain & Sourav Bandyopadhyay, 2020.
"Integration of multiple biological contexts reveals principles of synthetic lethality that affect reproducibility,"
Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:natcom:v:11:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-020-16078-y
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-16078-y
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:11:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-020-16078-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.