IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v11y2020i1d10.1038_s41467-020-14620-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Genetic screens in isogenic mammalian cell lines without single cell cloning

Author

Listed:
  • Peter C. DeWeirdt

    (Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard)

  • Annabel K. Sangree

    (Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard)

  • Ruth E. Hanna

    (Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard)

  • Kendall R. Sanson

    (Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard)

  • Mudra Hegde

    (Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard)

  • Christine Strand

    (Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard)

  • Nicole S. Persky

    (Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard)

  • John G. Doench

    (Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard)

Abstract

Isogenic pairs of cell lines, which differ by a single genetic modification, are powerful tools for understanding gene function. Generating such pairs of mammalian cells, however, is labor-intensive, time-consuming, and, in some cell types, essentially impossible. Here, we present an approach to create isogenic pairs of cells that avoids single cell cloning, and screen these pairs with genome-wide CRISPR-Cas9 libraries to generate genetic interaction maps. We query the anti-apoptotic genes BCL2L1 and MCL1, and the DNA damage repair gene PARP1, identifying both expected and uncharacterized buffering and synthetic lethal interactions. Additionally, we compare acute CRISPR-based knockout, single cell clones, and small-molecule inhibition. We observe that, while the approaches provide largely overlapping information, differences emerge, highlighting an important consideration when employing genetic screens to identify and characterize potential drug targets. We anticipate that this methodology will be broadly useful to comprehensively study gene function across many contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter C. DeWeirdt & Annabel K. Sangree & Ruth E. Hanna & Kendall R. Sanson & Mudra Hegde & Christine Strand & Nicole S. Persky & John G. Doench, 2020. "Genetic screens in isogenic mammalian cell lines without single cell cloning," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:11:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-020-14620-6
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-14620-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-14620-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-020-14620-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sumana Srivatsa & Hesam Montazeri & Gaia Bianco & Mairene Coto-Llerena & Mattia Marinucci & Charlotte K. Y. Ng & Salvatore Piscuoglio & Niko Beerenwinkel, 2022. "Discovery of synthetic lethal interactions from large-scale pan-cancer perturbation screens," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Peter C. DeWeirdt & Abby V. McGee & Fengyi Zheng & Ifunanya Nwolah & Mudra Hegde & John G. Doench, 2022. "Accounting for small variations in the tracrRNA sequence improves sgRNA activity predictions for CRISPR screening," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:11:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-020-14620-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.