Author
Listed:
- Katharina Kitzinger
(Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology
University of Vienna)
- Hannah K. Marchant
(Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology)
- Laura A. Bristow
(Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology
University of Southern Denmark)
- Craig W. Herbold
(University of Vienna)
- Cory C. Padilla
(School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology)
- Abiel T. Kidane
(Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology)
- Sten Littmann
(Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology)
- Holger Daims
(University of Vienna
University of Vienna)
- Petra Pjevac
(University of Vienna
Joint Microbiome Facility of the Medical University of Vienna and the University of Vienna)
- Frank J. Stewart
(School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology)
- Michael Wagner
(University of Vienna
University of Vienna
Joint Microbiome Facility of the Medical University of Vienna and the University of Vienna
Aalborg University)
- Marcel M. M. Kuypers
(Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology)
Abstract
Nitrification, the oxidation of ammonia via nitrite to nitrate, is a key process in marine nitrogen (N) cycling. Although oceanic ammonia and nitrite oxidation are balanced, ammonia-oxidizing archaea (AOA) vastly outnumber the main nitrite oxidizers, the bacterial Nitrospinae. The ecophysiological reasons for this discrepancy in abundance are unclear. Here, we compare substrate utilization and growth of Nitrospinae to AOA in the Gulf of Mexico. Based on our results, more than half of the Nitrospinae cellular N-demand is met by the organic-N compounds urea and cyanate, while AOA mainly assimilate ammonium. Nitrospinae have, under in situ conditions, around four-times higher biomass yield and five-times higher growth rates than AOA, despite their ten-fold lower abundance. Our combined results indicate that differences in mortality between Nitrospinae and AOA, rather than thermodynamics, biomass yield and cell size, determine the abundances of these main marine nitrifiers. Furthermore, there is no need to invoke yet undiscovered, abundant nitrite oxidizers to explain nitrification rates in the ocean.
Suggested Citation
Katharina Kitzinger & Hannah K. Marchant & Laura A. Bristow & Craig W. Herbold & Cory C. Padilla & Abiel T. Kidane & Sten Littmann & Holger Daims & Petra Pjevac & Frank J. Stewart & Michael Wagner & M, 2020.
"Single cell analyses reveal contrasting life strategies of the two main nitrifiers in the ocean,"
Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:natcom:v:11:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-020-14542-3
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-14542-3
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:11:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-020-14542-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.