Author
Listed:
- Amanda Laque
(The Scripps Research Institute)
- Genna De Ness
(The Scripps Research Institute)
- Grant E. Wagner
(The Scripps Research Institute)
- Hermina Nedelescu
(The Scripps Research Institute)
- Ayla Carroll
(The Scripps Research Institute)
- Debbie Watry
(The Scripps Research Institute)
- Tony Kerr
(The Scripps Research Institute)
- Eisuke Koya
(University of Sussex)
- Bruce T. Hope
(National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH/DHHS)
- Friedbert Weiss
(The Scripps Research Institute)
- Greg I. Elmer
(University of Maryland School of Medicine)
- Nobuyoshi Suto
(The Scripps Research Institute)
Abstract
Drug addiction is a chronic relapsing disorder of compulsive drug use. Studies of the neurobehavioral factors that promote drug relapse have yet to produce an effective treatment. Here we take a different approach and examine the factors that suppress—rather than promote—relapse. Adapting Pavlovian procedures to suppress operant drug response, we determined the anti-relapse action of environmental cues that signal drug omission (unavailability) in rats. Under laboratory conditions linked to compulsive drug use and heightened relapse risk, drug omission cues suppressed three major modes of relapse-promotion (drug-predictive cues, stress, and drug exposure) for cocaine and alcohol. This relapse-suppression is, in part, driven by omission cue-reactive neurons, which constitute small subsets of glutamatergic and GABAergic cells, in the infralimbic cortex. Future studies of such neural activity-based cellular units (neuronal ensembles/memory engram cells) for relapse-suppression can be used to identify alternate targets for addiction medicine through functional characterization of anti-relapse mechanisms.
Suggested Citation
Amanda Laque & Genna De Ness & Grant E. Wagner & Hermina Nedelescu & Ayla Carroll & Debbie Watry & Tony Kerr & Eisuke Koya & Bruce T. Hope & Friedbert Weiss & Greg I. Elmer & Nobuyoshi Suto, 2019.
"Anti-relapse neurons in the infralimbic cortex of rats drive relapse-suppression by drug omission cues,"
Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, December.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:natcom:v:10:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-019-11799-1
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-11799-1
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:10:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-019-11799-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.