IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v10y2019i1d10.1038_s41467-019-11062-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cryptic pocket formation underlies allosteric modulator selectivity at muscarinic GPCRs

Author

Listed:
  • Scott A. Hollingsworth

    (Stanford University
    Merck & Co.)

  • Brendan Kelly

    (Stanford University)

  • Celine Valant

    (Monash University)

  • Jordan Arthur Michaelis

    (Monash University)

  • Olivia Mastromihalis

    (Monash University)

  • Geoff Thompson

    (Monash University)

  • A. J. Venkatakrishnan

    (Stanford University)

  • Samuel Hertig

    (Stanford University)

  • Peter J. Scammells

    (Monash University)

  • Patrick M. Sexton

    (Monash University)

  • Christian C. Felder

    (Eli Lilly and Co., Neuroscience, Lilly Corporate Center
    Karuna Pharmaceuticals, Inc.)

  • Arthur Christopoulos

    (Monash University)

  • Ron O. Dror

    (Stanford University)

Abstract

Allosteric modulators are highly desirable as drugs, particularly for G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) targets, because allosteric drugs can achieve selectivity between closely related receptors. The mechanisms by which allosteric modulators achieve selectivity remain elusive, however, particularly given recent structures that reveal similar allosteric binding sites across receptors. Here we show that positive allosteric modulators (PAMs) of the M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) achieve exquisite selectivity by occupying a dynamic pocket absent in existing crystal structures. This cryptic pocket forms far more frequently in molecular dynamics simulations of the M1 mAChR than in those of other mAChRs. These observations reconcile mutagenesis data that previously appeared contradictory. Further mutagenesis experiments validate our prediction that preventing cryptic pocket opening decreases the affinity of M1-selective PAMs. Our findings suggest opportunities for the design of subtype-specific drugs exploiting cryptic pockets that open in certain receptors but not in other receptors with nearly identical static structures.

Suggested Citation

  • Scott A. Hollingsworth & Brendan Kelly & Celine Valant & Jordan Arthur Michaelis & Olivia Mastromihalis & Geoff Thompson & A. J. Venkatakrishnan & Samuel Hertig & Peter J. Scammells & Patrick M. Sexto, 2019. "Cryptic pocket formation underlies allosteric modulator selectivity at muscarinic GPCRs," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-9, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:10:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-019-11062-7
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-11062-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-019-11062-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-019-11062-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aslihan Shenol & Ricardo Tenente & Michael Lückmann & Thomas M. Frimurer & Thue W. Schwartz, 2024. "Multiple recent HCAR2 structures demonstrate a highly dynamic ligand binding and G protein activation mode," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-10, December.
    2. Artur Meller & Michael Ward & Jonathan Borowsky & Meghana Kshirsagar & Jeffrey M. Lotthammer & Felipe Oviedo & Juan Lavista Ferres & Gregory R. Bowman, 2023. "Predicting locations of cryptic pockets from single protein structures using the PocketMiner graph neural network," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    3. Xin Chen & Kexin Wang & Jianfang Chen & Chao Wu & Jun Mao & Yuanpeng Song & Yijing Liu & Zhenhua Shao & Xuemei Pu, 2024. "Integrative residue-intuitive machine learning and MD Approach to Unveil Allosteric Site and Mechanism for β2AR," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:10:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-019-11062-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.