Author
Listed:
- Nabil Elshafeey
(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center)
- Aikaterini Kotrotsou
(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center)
- Ahmed Hassan
(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center)
- Nancy Elshafei
(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Department of Restorative and Dental Materials, National Research Centre)
- Islam Hassan
(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center)
- Sara Ahmed
(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center)
- Srishti Abrol
(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center)
- Anand Agarwal
(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center)
- Kamel El Salek
(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center)
- Samuel Bergamaschi
(University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine)
- Jay Acharya
(University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine)
- Fanny E. Moron
(Baylor College of Medicine)
- Meng Law
(University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine
Alfred Health & Monash University)
- Gregory N. Fuller
(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center)
- Jason T. Huse
(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center)
- Pascal O. Zinn
(Baylor College of Medicine
University of Pittsburgh
UPMC Hillman Cancer Center)
- Rivka R. Colen
(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
UPMC Hillman Cancer Center
University of Pittsburgh)
Abstract
Pseudoprogression (PsP) is a diagnostic clinical dilemma in cancer. In this study, we retrospectively analyse glioblastoma patients, and using their dynamic susceptibility contrast and dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion MRI images we build a classifier using radiomic features obtained from both Ktrans and rCBV maps coupled with support vector machines. We achieve an accuracy of 90.82% (area under the curve (AUC) = 89.10%, sensitivity = 91.36%, 67 specificity = 88.24%, p = 0.017) in differentiating between pseudoprogression (PsP) and progressive disease (PD). The diagnostic performances of the models built using radiomic features from Ktrans and rCBV separately were equally high (Ktrans: AUC = 94%, 69 p = 0.012; rCBV: AUC = 89.8%, p = 0.004). Thus, this MR perfusion-based radiomic model demonstrates high accuracy, sensitivity and specificity in discriminating PsP from PD, thus provides a reliable alternative for noninvasive identification of PsP versus PD at the time of clinical/radiologic question. This study also illustrates the successful application of radiomic analysis as an advanced processing step on different MR perfusion maps.
Suggested Citation
Nabil Elshafeey & Aikaterini Kotrotsou & Ahmed Hassan & Nancy Elshafei & Islam Hassan & Sara Ahmed & Srishti Abrol & Anand Agarwal & Kamel El Salek & Samuel Bergamaschi & Jay Acharya & Fanny E. Moron , 2019.
"Multicenter study demonstrates radiomic features derived from magnetic resonance perfusion images identify pseudoprogression in glioblastoma,"
Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-9, December.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:natcom:v:10:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-019-11007-0
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-11007-0
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:10:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-019-11007-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.