IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v10y2019i1d10.1038_s41467-019-09355-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Classification of the human phox homology (PX) domains based on their phosphoinositide binding specificities

Author

Listed:
  • Mintu Chandra

    (The University of Queensland)

  • Yanni K.-Y. Chin

    (The University of Queensland)

  • Caroline Mas

    (The University of Queensland
    Integrated Structural Biology Grenoble)

  • J. Ryan Feathers

    (University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center)

  • Blessy Paul

    (The University of Queensland)

  • Sanchari Datta

    (University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center)

  • Kai-En Chen

    (The University of Queensland)

  • Xinying Jia

    (The University of Queensland)

  • Zhe Yang

    (The University of Queensland)

  • Suzanne J. Norwood

    (The University of Queensland)

  • Biswaranjan Mohanty

    (Monash University)

  • Andrea Bugarcic

    (The University of Queensland)

  • Rohan D. Teasdale

    (The University of Queensland
    The University of Queensland)

  • W. Mike Henne

    (University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center)

  • Mehdi Mobli

    (The University of Queensland)

  • Brett M. Collins

    (The University of Queensland)

Abstract

Phox homology (PX) domains are membrane interacting domains that bind to phosphatidylinositol phospholipids or phosphoinositides, markers of organelle identity in the endocytic system. Although many PX domains bind the canonical endosome-enriched lipid PtdIns3P, others interact with alternative phosphoinositides, and a precise understanding of how these specificities arise has remained elusive. Here we systematically screen all human PX domains for their phospholipid preferences using liposome binding assays, biolayer interferometry and isothermal titration calorimetry. These analyses define four distinct classes of human PX domains that either bind specifically to PtdIns3P, non-specifically to various di- and tri-phosphorylated phosphoinositides, bind both PtdIns3P and other phosphoinositides, or associate with none of the lipids tested. A comprehensive evaluation of PX domain structures reveals two distinct binding sites that explain these specificities, providing a basis for defining and predicting the functional membrane interactions of the entire PX domain protein family.

Suggested Citation

  • Mintu Chandra & Yanni K.-Y. Chin & Caroline Mas & J. Ryan Feathers & Blessy Paul & Sanchari Datta & Kai-En Chen & Xinying Jia & Zhe Yang & Suzanne J. Norwood & Biswaranjan Mohanty & Andrea Bugarcic & , 2019. "Classification of the human phox homology (PX) domains based on their phosphoinositide binding specificities," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:10:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-019-09355-y
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-09355-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-019-09355-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-019-09355-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jianting Shi & Xun Wu & Ziyi Wang & Fang Li & Yujiao Meng & Rebecca M. Moore & Jian Cui & Chenyi Xue & Katherine R. Croce & Arif Yurdagul & John G. Doench & Wei Li & Konstantinos S. Zarbalis & Ira Tab, 2022. "A genome-wide CRISPR screen identifies WDFY3 as a regulator of macrophage efferocytosis," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:10:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-019-09355-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.