Author
Listed:
- Guangyu Zhou
(Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine)
- Gregory Lane
(Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine)
- Torben Noto
(Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine)
- Ghazaleh Arabkheradmand
(Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine)
- Jay A. Gottfried
(University of Pennsylvania
University of Pennsylvania)
- Stephan U. Schuele
(Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine)
- Joshua M. Rosenow
(Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine)
- Jonas K. Olofsson
(Stockholm University)
- Donald A. Wilson
(New York University School of Medicine
New York University)
- Christina Zelano
(Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine)
Abstract
Multisensory integration is particularly important in the human olfactory system, which is highly dependent on non-olfactory cues, yet its underlying neural mechanisms are not well understood. In this study, we use intracranial electroencephalography techniques to record neural activity in auditory and olfactory cortices during an auditory-olfactory matching task. Spoken cues evoke phase locking between low frequency oscillations in auditory and olfactory cortices prior to odor arrival. This phase synchrony occurs only when the participant’s later response is correct. Furthermore, the phase of low frequency oscillations in both auditory and olfactory cortical areas couples to the amplitude of high-frequency oscillations in olfactory cortex during correct trials. These findings suggest that phase synchrony is a fundamental mechanism for integrating cross-modal odor processing and highlight an important role for primary olfactory cortical areas in multisensory integration with the olfactory system.
Suggested Citation
Guangyu Zhou & Gregory Lane & Torben Noto & Ghazaleh Arabkheradmand & Jay A. Gottfried & Stephan U. Schuele & Joshua M. Rosenow & Jonas K. Olofsson & Donald A. Wilson & Christina Zelano, 2019.
"Human olfactory-auditory integration requires phase synchrony between sensory cortices,"
Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-12, December.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:natcom:v:10:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-019-09091-3
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-09091-3
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:10:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-019-09091-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.