IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v10y2019i1d10.1038_s41467-019-09087-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inverse resource allocation between vision and olfaction across the genus Drosophila

Author

Listed:
  • Ian W. Keesey

    (Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Department of Evolutionary Neuroethology)

  • Veit Grabe

    (Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Department of Evolutionary Neuroethology)

  • Lydia Gruber

    (Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Department of Evolutionary Neuroethology)

  • Sarah Koerte

    (Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Department of Evolutionary Neuroethology)

  • George F. Obiero

    (Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Department of Evolutionary Neuroethology
    Technical University of Kenya)

  • Grant Bolton

    (University of Missouri, Division of Plant Sciences)

  • Mohammed A. Khallaf

    (Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Department of Evolutionary Neuroethology)

  • Grit Kunert

    (Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Department of Biochemistry)

  • Sofia Lavista-Llanos

    (Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Department of Evolutionary Neuroethology)

  • Dario Riccardo Valenzano

    (Max Planck Institute for Biology of Ageing and CECAD at University of Cologne)

  • Jürgen Rybak

    (Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Department of Evolutionary Neuroethology)

  • Bruce A. Barrett

    (University of Missouri, Division of Plant Sciences)

  • Markus Knaden

    (Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Department of Evolutionary Neuroethology)

  • Bill S. Hansson

    (Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Department of Evolutionary Neuroethology)

Abstract

Divergent populations across different environments are exposed to critical sensory information related to locating a host or mate, as well as avoiding predators and pathogens. These sensory signals generate evolutionary changes in neuroanatomy and behavior; however, few studies have investigated patterns of neural architecture that occur between sensory systems, or that occur within large groups of closely-related organisms. Here we examine 62 species within the genus Drosophila and describe an inverse resource allocation between vision and olfaction, which we consistently observe at the periphery, within the brain, as well as during larval development. This sensory variation was noted across the entire genus and appears to represent repeated, independent evolutionary events, where one sensory modality is consistently selected for at the expense of the other. Moreover, we provide evidence of a developmental genetic constraint through the sharing of a single larval structure, the eye-antennal imaginal disc. In addition, we examine the ecological implications of visual or olfactory bias, including the potential impact on host-navigation and courtship.

Suggested Citation

  • Ian W. Keesey & Veit Grabe & Lydia Gruber & Sarah Koerte & George F. Obiero & Grant Bolton & Mohammed A. Khallaf & Grit Kunert & Sofia Lavista-Llanos & Dario Riccardo Valenzano & Jürgen Rybak & Bruce , 2019. "Inverse resource allocation between vision and olfaction across the genus Drosophila," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:10:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-019-09087-z
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-09087-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-019-09087-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-019-09087-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Max S. Farnworth & Stephen H. Montgomery, 2022. "Complexity of biological scaling suggests an absence of systematic trade-offs between sensory modalities in Drosophila," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-5, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:10:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-019-09087-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.