Author
Listed:
- Jonathan J. Buonocore
(Center for Health and the Global Environment, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health)
- Patrick Luckow
(Synapse Energy Economics)
- Gregory Norris
(Center for Health and the Global Environment, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health)
- John D. Spengler
(Center for Health and the Global Environment, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health)
- Bruce Biewald
(Synapse Energy Economics)
- Jeremy Fisher
(Synapse Energy Economics)
- Jonathan I. Levy
(Center for Health and the Global Environment, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
Boston University School of Public Health)
Abstract
Energy efficiency (EE) and renewable energy (RE) can benefit public health and the climate by displacing emissions from fossil-fuelled electrical generating units (EGUs). Benefits can vary substantially by EE/RE installation type and location, due to differing electricity generation or savings by location, characteristics of the electrical grid and displaced power plants, along with population patterns. However, previous studies have not formally examined how these dimensions individually and jointly contribute to variability in benefits across locations or EE/RE types. Here, we develop and demonstrate a high-resolution model to simulate and compare the monetized public health and climate benefits of four different illustrative EE/RE installation types in six different locations within the Mid-Atlantic and Lower Great Lakes of the United States. Annual benefits using central estimates for all pathways ranged from US$5.7–US$210 million (US$14–US$170 MWh−1), emphasizing the importance of site-specific information in accurately estimating public health and climate benefits of EE/RE efforts.
Suggested Citation
Jonathan J. Buonocore & Patrick Luckow & Gregory Norris & John D. Spengler & Bruce Biewald & Jeremy Fisher & Jonathan I. Levy, 2016.
"Health and climate benefits of different energy-efficiency and renewable energy choices,"
Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 6(1), pages 100-105, January.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:natcli:v:6:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1038_nclimate2771
DOI: 10.1038/nclimate2771
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcli:v:6:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1038_nclimate2771. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.