Author
Listed:
- Harry J. Dowsett
(Eastern Geology and Paleoclimate Science Center, US Geological Survey)
- Marci M. Robinson
(Eastern Geology and Paleoclimate Science Center, US Geological Survey)
- Alan M. Haywood
(School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds)
- Daniel J. Hill
(School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds
Climate Change Group, British Geological Survey)
- Aisling M. Dolan
(School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds)
- Danielle K. Stoll
(Eastern Geology and Paleoclimate Science Center, US Geological Survey)
- Wing-Le Chan
(Atmosphere and Ocean Research Institute, University of Tokyo)
- Ayako Abe-Ouchi
(Atmosphere and Ocean Research Institute, University of Tokyo
Research Institute for Global Change, Japan Agency for Marine–Earth Science and Technology)
- Mark A. Chandler
(Columbia University—NASA/GISS)
- Nan A. Rosenbloom
(National Center for Atmospheric Research)
- Bette L. Otto-Bliesner
(National Center for Atmospheric Research)
- Fran J. Bragg
(School of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol)
- Daniel J. Lunt
(School of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol)
- Kevin M. Foley
(Eastern Geology and Paleoclimate Science Center, US Geological Survey)
- Christina R. Riesselman
(Eastern Geology and Paleoclimate Science Center, US Geological Survey)
Abstract
In light of mounting empirical evidence that planetary warming is well underway, the climate research community looks to palaeoclimate research for a ground-truthing measure with which to test the accuracy of future climate simulations. Model experiments that attempt to simulate climates of the past serve to identify both similarities and differences between two climate states and, when compared with simulations run by other models and with geological data, to identify model-specific biases. Uncertainties associated with both the data and the models must be considered in such an exercise. The most recent period of sustained global warmth similar to what is projected for the near future occurred about 3.3–3.0 million years ago, during the Pliocene epoch. Here, we present Pliocene sea surface temperature data, newly characterized in terms of level of confidence, along with initial experimental results from four climate models. We conclude that, in terms of sea surface temperature, models are in good agreement with estimates of Pliocene sea surface temperature in most regions except the North Atlantic. Our analysis indicates that the discrepancy between the Pliocene proxy data and model simulations in the mid-latitudes of the North Atlantic, where models underestimate warming shown by our highest-confidence data, may provide a new perspective and insight into the predictive abilities of these models in simulating a past warm interval in Earth history. This is important because the Pliocene has a number of parallels to present predictions of late twenty-first century climate.
Suggested Citation
Harry J. Dowsett & Marci M. Robinson & Alan M. Haywood & Daniel J. Hill & Aisling M. Dolan & Danielle K. Stoll & Wing-Le Chan & Ayako Abe-Ouchi & Mark A. Chandler & Nan A. Rosenbloom & Bette L. Otto-B, 2012.
"Assessing confidence in Pliocene sea surface temperatures to evaluate predictive models,"
Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 2(5), pages 365-371, May.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:natcli:v:2:y:2012:i:5:d:10.1038_nclimate1455
DOI: 10.1038/nclimate1455
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcli:v:2:y:2012:i:5:d:10.1038_nclimate1455. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.