Author
Listed:
- Yu Liu
(Peking University
Peking University)
- Mingxi Du
(Xi’an Jiaotong University)
- Lingyu Yang
(University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
Chinese Academy of Sciences)
- Qi Cui
(China University of Petroleum)
- Yawen Liu
(University of International Business and Economics)
- Xinbei Li
(University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
Chinese Academy of Sciences)
- Nenggao Zhu
(University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
Chinese Academy of Sciences)
- Ying Li
(Chinese Academy of Personnel Science)
- Chen Jiang
(University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
Chinese Academy of Sciences)
- Peng Zhou
(China University of Petroleum)
- Qiuyu Liu
(Xi’an Jiaotong University)
- Canfei He
(Peking University)
Abstract
The achievement of China’s carbon neutrality is crucial for the 1.5 °C target of the Paris Agreement and must involve the implementation of various mitigation policies. However, these efforts are hindered by poor knowledge of the interactions between policies. Here we use a dynamic computable general equilibrium model of China (CEEGE model) and create a policy portfolio area of 1,295 scenarios covering four major mitigation strategies (carbon pricing, energy efficiency, renewable energy and electrification of end uses). When the interactions between mitigation policies are considered, the percentage of scenarios in which the carbon neutrality target is reached by 2060 decreases by 84%, with the years in which these scenarios are achieved being delayed by 5–6 years. Only the combinations with renewable energy and electrification of end uses generate synergetic effects on both economic and mitigation impacts. Our work can inform the formulation of more efficient mitigation policy portfolios by emphasizing policy interactions.
Suggested Citation
Yu Liu & Mingxi Du & Lingyu Yang & Qi Cui & Yawen Liu & Xinbei Li & Nenggao Zhu & Ying Li & Chen Jiang & Peng Zhou & Qiuyu Liu & Canfei He, 2025.
"Mitigation policies interactions delay the achievement of carbon neutrality in China,"
Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 15(2), pages 147-152, February.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:natcli:v:15:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1038_s41558-024-02237-2
DOI: 10.1038/s41558-024-02237-2
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcli:v:15:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1038_s41558-024-02237-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.