Author
Listed:
- Ahmed I. Abdo
(South China Agricultural University
Shaoguan University
Zagazig University)
- Daolin Sun
(South China Agricultural University
South China Agricultural University
Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Centre of Modern Eco-agriculture and Circular Agriculture)
- Zhaoji Shi
(South China Agricultural University
South China Agricultural University
Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Centre of Modern Eco-agriculture and Circular Agriculture)
- Mohamed K. Abdel-Fattah
(Zagazig University)
- Jiaen Zhang
(South China Agricultural University
South China Agricultural University
Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Centre of Modern Eco-agriculture and Circular Agriculture
South China Agricultural University)
- Yakov Kuzyakov
(Peoples Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
University of Goettingen)
Abstract
Intensification of farming since the Green Revolution has led to large increases in yield but has also increased anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions. Here, by providing a global comprehensive cradle-to-gate quantification from seed to yield, we show that the global warming potential (GWP) of conventional agriculture of grain crops has increased eightfold from 1961 to 2020, whereas the sustainability index (SI) has decreased threefold. Tillage, synthetic fertilizers and irrigation together accounted for 90% of the increased GWP, linked to tenfold increases in fertilization and groundwater use and more than doubled mechanized and irrigated areas. We highlight regions with high GWP and low SI, such as South Asia, and project further threefold increases in agriculture GWP by 2100 compared with 2020 (3.3 ± 0.73 PgCO2e) driven by declined use efficiency of the inputs. Green energy and climate-smart agriculture techniques can reduce the projected GWP in 2100 to 2.3 PgCO2e and increase the SI fourfold.
Suggested Citation
Ahmed I. Abdo & Daolin Sun & Zhaoji Shi & Mohamed K. Abdel-Fattah & Jiaen Zhang & Yakov Kuzyakov, 2025.
"Conventional agriculture increases global warming while decreasing system sustainability,"
Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 110-117, January.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:natcli:v:15:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41558-024-02170-4
DOI: 10.1038/s41558-024-02170-4
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcli:v:15:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41558-024-02170-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.