Author
Listed:
- Yunpeng Zhao
(Chinese Academy of Sciences
China National Botanical Garden
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences)
- Chengzhu Liu
(Chinese Academy of Sciences
China National Botanical Garden
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences)
- Enze Kang
(Chinese Academy of Sciences
China National Botanical Garden
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences)
- Xingqi Li
(Chinese Academy of Sciences
China National Botanical Garden
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences)
- Ye Deng
(University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
Chinese Academy of Sciences)
- Xiaojuan Feng
(Chinese Academy of Sciences
China National Botanical Garden
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences)
Abstract
The carbon storage of wetlands is related to inhibited enzyme activity (particularly phenol oxidase) under oxygen-deprived conditions. However, phenol oxidase response to field drainage is highly uncertain, constraining our ability to predict wetland carbon–climate feedbacks. Here, using literature data, laboratory simulations and a pair-wise survey of 30 diverse wetlands experiencing long-term (15–55 years) drainage across China, we show that while short-term drainage generally leads to increased phenol oxidative activity, its response to long-term drainage diverges in Sphagnum versus non-Sphagnum wetlands. In non-Sphagnum wetlands, long-term drainage is linked to increased plant secondary metabolites and decreased phenol oxidase-producing microbes, while in Sphagnum wetlands, drainage is linked to replacement of antimicrobial Sphagnum by vascular plants and increased phenol oxidative activity with cascading effects on hydrolytic enzymes. Our findings highlight that trait-based plant dynamics are pivotal to decipher wetland carbon dynamics and feedback to climate change under shifting hydrological regimes.
Suggested Citation
Yunpeng Zhao & Chengzhu Liu & Enze Kang & Xingqi Li & Ye Deng & Xiaojuan Feng, 2024.
"Plant–microbe interactions underpin contrasting enzymatic responses to wetland drainage,"
Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 14(10), pages 1078-1086, October.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:natcli:v:14:y:2024:i:10:d:10.1038_s41558-024-02101-3
DOI: 10.1038/s41558-024-02101-3
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcli:v:14:y:2024:i:10:d:10.1038_s41558-024-02101-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.