Author
Listed:
- Shinichiro Asayama
(National Institute for Environmental Studies)
- Kari Pryck
(University of Geneva)
- Silke Beck
(Technical University of Munich)
- Béatrice Cointe
(Mines Paris, PSL University, i3 CNRS (UMR 9217))
- Paul N. Edwards
(Stanford University)
- Hélène Guillemot
(Centre Alexandre Koyré, CNRS)
- Karin M. Gustafsson
(Örebro University)
- Friederike Hartz
(University of Cambridge)
- Hannah Hughes
(Aberystwyth University)
- Bård Lahn
(University of Oslo)
- Olivier Leclerc
(Université Paris Nanterre, Ecole Normale Supérieure – PSL)
- Rolf Lidskog
(Örebro University)
- Jasmine E. Livingston
(Utrecht University)
- Irene Lorenzoni
(University of East Anglia)
- Joanna Petrasek MacDonald
(Joanna Petrasek MacDonald Consulting)
- Martin Mahony
(University of East Anglia)
- Jean Carlos Hochsprung Miguel
(State University of Campinas)
- Marko Monteiro
(State University of Campinas)
- Jessica O’Reilly
(Indiana University Bloomington)
- Warren Pearce
(University of Sheffield)
- Arthur Petersen
(University College London)
- Bernd Siebenhüner
(Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg
Nelson Mandela University)
- Tora Skodvin
(University of Oslo)
- Adam Standring
(Örebro University
De Montfort University)
- Göran Sundqvist
(University of Gothenburg)
- Renzo Taddei
(Federal University of São Paulo)
- Bianca Bavel
(University College Dublin
University of Leeds)
- Mark Vardy
(Kwantlen Polytechnic University)
- Yulia Yamineva
(University of Eastern Finland)
- Mike Hulme
(University of Cambridge)
Abstract
The IPCC has been successful at building its scientific authority, but it will require institutional reform for staying relevant to new and changing political contexts. Exploring a range of alternative future pathways for the IPCC can help guide crucial decisions about redefining its purpose.
Suggested Citation
Shinichiro Asayama & Kari Pryck & Silke Beck & Béatrice Cointe & Paul N. Edwards & Hélène Guillemot & Karin M. Gustafsson & Friederike Hartz & Hannah Hughes & Bård Lahn & Olivier Leclerc & Rolf Lidsko, 2023.
"Three institutional pathways to envision the future of the IPCC,"
Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 13(9), pages 877-880, September.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:natcli:v:13:y:2023:i:9:d:10.1038_s41558-023-01780-8
DOI: 10.1038/s41558-023-01780-8
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcli:v:13:y:2023:i:9:d:10.1038_s41558-023-01780-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.