Author
Listed:
- Johannes Mülmenstädt
(Universität Leipzig
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory)
- Marc Salzmann
(Universität Leipzig)
- Jennifer E. Kay
(University of Colorado Boulder)
- Mark D. Zelinka
(Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory)
- Po-Lun Ma
(Pacific Northwest National Laboratory)
- Christine Nam
(Universität Leipzig
Climate Service Center Germany, Helmholtz-Zentrum Hereon GmbH)
- Jan Kretzschmar
(Universität Leipzig)
- Sabine Hörnig
(Universität Leipzig)
- Johannes Quaas
(Universität Leipzig)
Abstract
As the atmosphere warms, part of the cloud population shifts from ice and mixed-phase (‘cold’) to liquid (‘warm’) clouds. Because warm clouds are more reflective and longer-lived, this phase change reduces the solar flux absorbed by the Earth and constitutes a negative radiative feedback. This cooling feedback is weaker in the sixth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) than in the fifth phase (CMIP5), contributing to greater greenhouse warming. Although this change is often attributed to improvements in the simulated cloud phase, another model bias persists: warm clouds precipitate too readily, potentially leading to underestimated negative lifetime feedbacks. In this study we modified a climate model to better simulate warm-rain probability and found that it exhibits a cloud lifetime feedback nearly three times larger than the default model. This suggests that model errors in cloud-precipitation processes may bias cloud feedbacks by as much as the CMIP5-to-CMIP6 climate sensitivity difference. Reliable climate model projections therefore require improved cloud process realism guided by process-oriented observations and observational constraints.
Suggested Citation
Johannes Mülmenstädt & Marc Salzmann & Jennifer E. Kay & Mark D. Zelinka & Po-Lun Ma & Christine Nam & Jan Kretzschmar & Sabine Hörnig & Johannes Quaas, 2021.
"An underestimated negative cloud feedback from cloud lifetime changes,"
Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 11(6), pages 508-513, June.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:natcli:v:11:y:2021:i:6:d:10.1038_s41558-021-01038-1
DOI: 10.1038/s41558-021-01038-1
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcli:v:11:y:2021:i:6:d:10.1038_s41558-021-01038-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.