IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nas/journl/v122y2025pe2421436122.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Top-performing girls are more impactful peer role models than boys, teachers say

Author

Listed:
  • Sofoklis Goulas

    (a Economic Studies Program , Brookings Institution , Washington , DC 20036)

  • Rigissa Megalokonomou

    (b Department of Economics , Monash University , Melbourne , VIC 3145 , Australia)

  • Panagiotis Sotirakopoulos

    (c Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre , Curtin University , Perth , WA 6102 , Australia)

Abstract

We examine teachers’ perceptions toward top-performing students and their role model influence on others in an online survey-based experiment. We randomly expose teachers to profiles of top-performing students and inquire whether they consider the profiled top performers to be influential role models. These profiles varied by gender and field of study (STEM or Non-STEM). Our findings show that teachers perceive top-performing girls as more influential peer role models compared to top-performing boys ( β ̂ = 0.289 ; P < 0.001 ). We also investigate the qualities teachers perceive top performers who are successful role models to have. We show that teachers associate a greater sense of learning autonomy and sense of being an example with top-performing girls compared to top-performing boys. Estimated effects are more pronounced among teachers with children and teachers in urban areas. Administrative data from a representative sample show limited observed differences between top-performing boys’ and girls’ educational outcomes that could justify the differences in teachers’ gender perceptions. These findings carry significant implications for education, as teachers play a crucial role in the cultivation of positive externalities between students.

Suggested Citation

  • Sofoklis Goulas & Rigissa Megalokonomou & Panagiotis Sotirakopoulos, 2025. "Top-performing girls are more impactful peer role models than boys, teachers say," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 122(6), pages 2421436122-, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:nas:journl:v:122:y:2025:p:e2421436122
    DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2421436122
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2421436122
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1073/pnas.2421436122?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Keywords

    teacher gender stereotypes; randomized controlled trial; peer role models; STEM;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I21 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Analysis of Education
    • I24 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Education and Inequality
    • J16 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination
    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
    • C90 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nas:journl:v:122:y:2025:p:e2421436122. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: PNAS Product Team (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.pnas.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.