IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nas/journl/v121y2024pe2414041121.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling and testing strategic interdependence and tipping in public policy implementation

Author

Listed:
  • Lu Liu

    (a New York University Shanghai , Shanghai 200124 , China)

  • Zhihan Cui

    (b Institute of Global Health and Development, Peking University , Beijing 100871 , China)

  • Howard Kunreuther

    (c Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia , PA 19104)

  • Geoffrey Heal

    (d Economics Division, Columbia Business School , New York , NY 10027)

Abstract

We develop a game-theoretic model of strategic interdependence and tipping in public policy choices and show that the model can be estimated by probit and logit estimators. We test its validity and applicability by using daily data on state-level COVID-19 responses in the United States. Social distancing via shelter-in-place (SIP) strategies and wearing masks emerged as the most effective nonpharmaceutical ways of combatting COVID-19. In the United States, choices about these policies are made by individual states. We develop a game-theoretic model of such choices and test it econometrically, confirming strong interdependence in the implementation of these policies. If enough states engage in social distancing or mask wearing, others will be tipped to follow suit. Policy choices are influenced mainly by the choices of other states, especially those of similar political orientation and to a lesser degree by the number of new COVID-19 cases. The choice of mask-wearing policies is more sensitive to peer choices than the choice of SIP policies, and Republican states are much less likely than Democratic to introduce mask-wearing policies. The choices of policies are influenced more by political than public health considerations. These findings emphasize strategic interdependence in policy choice and offer an analytical framework for these complex dynamics.

Suggested Citation

  • Lu Liu & Zhihan Cui & Howard Kunreuther & Geoffrey Heal, 2024. "Modeling and testing strategic interdependence and tipping in public policy implementation," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 121(48), pages 2414041121-, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:nas:journl:v:121:y:2024:p:e2414041121
    DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2414041121
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2414041121
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1073/pnas.2414041121?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nas:journl:v:121:y:2024:p:e2414041121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eric Cain (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.pnas.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.