Author
Listed:
- Markus Dertwinkel-Kalt
(b Experimental Economics Group, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods Bonn , Bonn 53113 , Germany)
- Christoph Feldhaus
(c Faculty of Management and Economics, Ruhr-University Bochum , Bochum 44801 , Germany)
- Axel Ockenfels
(d Department of Economics, University of Cologne , Cologne 50935 , Germany)
- Matthias Sutter
(f Department of Economics, University of Venice , Venice 30123 , Italy)
Abstract
In response to the disruption of gas supplies from Russia following the invasion of Ukraine in 2022, European politicians and public utilities appealed to citizens and customers to conserve natural gas. Moreover, they strengthened economic incentives for gas conservation. In fact, a substantial amount of natural gas was saved during the winter of 2022/23. This raises the question to what extent this success is attributable to government and corporate means to foster energy conservation in the crisis, including energy policies such as the German government’s “gas price brake,†gas-saving programs launched by public utilities, and consumers’ individual pricing schemes. We analyzed the effectiveness of these means using a survey and a field experiment with a German gas supplier and show that, while household savings during the crisis were substantial, economic incentives did not significantly change behavior. Indeed, demand for gas is largely price inelastic. A large majority of consumers do not understand the incentives arising from the gas price brake, and when they do, they do not respond. Likewise, consumers do not react to the design of the utilities’ gas-saving program. These findings suggest that i) citizens’ response to marginal individual economic incentives contributes little to overall gas savings, and ii) the crisis, along with the extensive societal engagement it generated, likely shifted the public’s mindset about energy consumption, making conservation a social priority.
Suggested Citation
Markus Dertwinkel-Kalt & Christoph Feldhaus & Axel Ockenfels & Matthias Sutter, 2024.
"Household reduction of gas consumption in the energy crisis is not explained by individual economic incentives,"
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 121(48), pages 2411740121-, November.
Handle:
RePEc:nas:journl:v:121:y:2024:p:e2411740121
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2411740121
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nas:journl:v:121:y:2024:p:e2411740121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eric Cain (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.pnas.org/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.