IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nas/journl/v121y2024pe2321978121.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The economic case for scaling up health research and development: Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Tortorice

    (a Department of Economics and Accounting, College of the Holy Cross , Worcester , MA 01610)

  • Rino Rappuoli

    (b Fondazione Biotecnopolo di Siena , Siena 53100 , Italy)

  • David E. Bloom

    (c Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health , Boston , MA 02115)

Abstract

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, governments directly funded vaccine research and development (R&D), quickly leading to multiple effective vaccines and resulting in enormous health and economic benefits to society. We develop a simple economic model showing this feat could potentially be repeated for other health challenges. Based on inputs from the economic and medical literatures, the model yields estimates of optimal R&D spending on treatments and vaccines for known diseases. Taking a global and societal perspective, we estimate the social benefits of such spending and a corresponding rate of return. Applications to Streptococcus A vaccines and Alzheimer’s disease treatments demonstrate the potential of enhanced research and development funding to unlock massive global health and health-related benefits. We estimate that these benefits range from 2 to 60 trillion (2020 US$) and that the corresponding rates of return on R&D spending range from 12% to 23% per year for 30 y. We discuss the current shortfall in R&D spending and public policies that can move current funding closer to the optimal level.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Tortorice & Rino Rappuoli & David E. Bloom, 2024. "The economic case for scaling up health research and development: Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 121(26), pages 2321978121-, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:nas:journl:v:121:y:2024:p:e2321978121
    DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2321978121
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2321978121
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1073/pnas.2321978121?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nas:journl:v:121:y:2024:p:e2321978121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eric Cain (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.pnas.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.