IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nas/journl/v121y2024pe2307505121.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

White Americans’ preference for Black people in advertising has increased in the past 66 years: A meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Julia Diana Lenk

    (a University of Hamburg, Faculty of Business Administration , Hamburg 20148 , Germany)

  • Jochen Hartmann

    (b Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Management , Munich 80333 , Germany)

  • Henrik Sattler

    (a University of Hamburg, Faculty of Business Administration , Hamburg 20148 , Germany)

Abstract

This study investigates Black and White consumers’ preferences for Black versus White people in United States advertising contexts over 66 y, from 1956 until 2022, a time in which the United States has experienced significant ethno-racial diversification. Examining Black and White consumers’ reactions to visual advertising over more than half a century offers a unique and dynamic view of interracial preferences. Mass advertising reaches an audience of billions and can shape people’s attitudes and behavior, emphasizing the relevance of clarifying the influence of race in advertising, how it has evolved over time, and how it may contribute to mitigating discrimination based on racial perceptions. A meta-analysis of extant experiments into the relationship between the depicted endorser’s race (i.e., the model in a visual ad) and the reaction of Black and White viewers pertains to 332 effect sizes from 62 studies reported in 52 scientific papers, comprising 10,186 Black and White participants. Our results are anchored in a conceptual framework, including a comprehensive set of perceiver (viewer), target (endorser), social/societal context, and publication characteristics. Without accounting for temporal dynamics, the results indicate ingroup favoritism, such that White viewers prefer White models and Black viewers prefer Black models. But by controlling for the publication year, it is possible to observe a time-dependent trend: Historically, White consumers preferred endorsers of the same race, but this preference has significantly shifted toward Black endorsers in recent years. In contrast, the level of Black consumers’ reactions to endorsers of the same race remains largely unchanged over time.

Suggested Citation

  • Julia Diana Lenk & Jochen Hartmann & Henrik Sattler, 2024. "White Americans’ preference for Black people in advertising has increased in the past 66 years: A meta-analysis," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 121(9), pages 2307505121-, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:nas:journl:v:121:y:2024:p:e2307505121
    DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2307505121
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2307505121
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1073/pnas.2307505121?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nas:journl:v:121:y:2024:p:e2307505121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eric Cain (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.pnas.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.