IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nas/journl/v119y2022pe2201847119.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reply to Spreco et al.: Perceived corruption and preferences for COVID-19 vaccine allocations

Author

Listed:
  • Raymond Duch

    (a Nuffield College, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 1NF, United Kingdom;)

  • Thomas S. Robinson

    (b School of Government and International Affairs, Durham University, Durham DH1 3TU, United Kingdom;)

  • Philip M. Clarke

    (c Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF, United Kingdom;; d Centre For Health Policy, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia)

  • Laurence S. J. Roope

    (c Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF, United Kingdom;)

  • Mara Violato

    (c Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF, United Kingdom;)

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Raymond Duch & Thomas S. Robinson & Philip M. Clarke & Laurence S. J. Roope & Mara Violato, 2022. "Reply to Spreco et al.: Perceived corruption and preferences for COVID-19 vaccine allocations," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 119(19), pages 2201847119-, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:nas:journl:v:119:y:2022:p:e2201847119
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.pnas.org/content/119/19/e2201847119.full
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nas:journl:v:119:y:2022:p:e2201847119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eric Cain (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.pnas.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.