Author
Listed:
- Oriel Sullivan
(Economic and Social Research Council Centre for Time Use Research, Social Research Institute, University College London, London WC1H 0AL, United Kingdom)
- Jonathan Gershuny
(Economic and Social Research Council Centre for Time Use Research, Social Research Institute, University College London, London WC1H 0AL, United Kingdom)
- Almudena Sevilla
(Economic and Social Research Council Centre for Time Use Research, Social Research Institute, University College London, London WC1H 0AL, United Kingdom)
- Francesca Foliano
(Economic and Social Research Council Centre for Time Use Research, Social Research Institute, University College London, London WC1H 0AL, United Kingdom)
- Margarita Vega-Rapun
(Economic and Social Research Council Centre for Time Use Research, Social Research Institute, University College London, London WC1H 0AL, United Kingdom)
- Juana Lamote de Grignon
(Economic and Social Research Council Centre for Time Use Research, Social Research Institute, University College London, London WC1H 0AL, United Kingdom)
- Teresa Harms
(Economic and Social Research Council Centre for Time Use Research, Social Research Institute, University College London, London WC1H 0AL, United Kingdom)
- Pierre Walthéry
(Economic and Social Research Council Centre for Time Use Research, Social Research Institute, University College London, London WC1H 0AL, United Kingdom)
Abstract
How did people change their behavior over the different phases of the UK COVID-19 restrictions, and how did these changes affect their risk of being exposed to infection? Time-use diary surveys are unique in providing a complete chronicle of daily behavior: 24-h continuous records of the populations’ activities, their social context, and their location. We present results from four such surveys, collected in real time from representative UK samples, both before and at three points over the course of the current pandemic. Comparing across the four waves, we find evidence of substantial changes in the UK population’s behavior relating to activities, locations, and social context. We assign different levels of risk to combinations of activities, locations, and copresence to compare risk-related behavior across successive “lockdowns.” We find evidence that during the second lockdown (November 2020), there was an increase in high-risk behaviors relative to the first (starting March 2020). This increase is shown to be associated with more paid work time in the workplace. At a time when capacity is still limited both in respect of immunization and track–trace technology, governments must continue to rely on changes in people’s daily behaviors to contain the spread of COVID-19 and similar viruses. Time-use diary information of this type, collected in real time across the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, can provide policy makers with information to assess and quantify changes in daily behaviors and the impact they are likely to have on overall behavioral-associated risks.
Suggested Citation
Oriel Sullivan & Jonathan Gershuny & Almudena Sevilla & Francesca Foliano & Margarita Vega-Rapun & Juana Lamote de Grignon & Teresa Harms & Pierre Walthéry, 2021.
"Using time-use diaries to track changing behavior across successive stages of COVID-19 social restrictions,"
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 118(35), pages 2101724118-, August.
Handle:
RePEc:nas:journl:v:118:y:2021:p:e2101724118
Download full text from publisher
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Foliano, Francesca & Tonei, Valentina & Sevilla, Almudena, 2024.
"Social restrictions, leisure and well-being,"
Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
- Zhou, Mingzhi & Zhou, Jiangping, 2024.
"Multiscalar trip resilience and metro station-area characteristics: A case study of Hong Kong amid the pandemic,"
Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nas:journl:v:118:y:2021:p:e2101724118. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eric Cain (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.pnas.org/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.